Movies-TV

100 Million BC Movie

Genres are Produced in 2008, USA
  Resolution Size Download
624x336 698.22 MiB divx
320x176 341.99 MiB ipod

Storyline

TAGLINES PLOT SUMMARY

A scientist from the failed Philadelphia Experiment leads a team of Navy SEALs back in time to the Cretaceous Period to rescue the first team he sent back during the 1940s. Things go wildly awry though, when on his return he accidentally brings a giant, man-eating dinosaur back through the portal and into modern-day, downtown Los Angeles.

ACTORS
Michael Gross Dr. Frank Reno
Christopher Atkins Erik Reno
Greg Evigan LCDR Ellis Dorn
Stephen Blackehart Lt. Robert Peet
Geoff Meed CPO Lopes
Dean Kreyling Chief 'Bud' Stark
Wendy Carter Betty
Marie Westbrook Ruth
Phil Burke Stubbs
Nick McCallum Burke
Aaron Stigger Manriquez
Daniel Ponsky Jones
James Viera Przyzicki
John Karyus Scientist
DIRECTOR
Griff Furst
IMDB Rating

3.00 out of 10 (103 votes)

Download 100 million BC movie (2008)
Stills Gallery

Visitor Reviews

LOL oh dear!

posted on 24 Aug 2009

Defiantly up there with the worst films I've ever seen.Basically they send a team of seals back in time 70 millions years, to rescue a group of folks from the fifties that got trapped there. However instead of arming them to the hilt they decide to arm them with a bunch of pea shooters. The team then come across a bunch of dino's that can dodge bullets, become invisible at will and run at what looks like 1000 mph.Most of the team are eaten, but just when its looks like its all over the dudes from the fifties jump out and whip the bullet dodging, semi invisible 1000 mph dino's with a few sharpened sticks.They then come back to the present and just so happen to leave the door open for what looks like a REX but is three times the size, to come through. In any event this REX like thing, is also bullet proof, can smash armoured cars with its head and run about 40-50. What would we do in such a situation? Well i'd prob suggest sending a few tanks to greet the chap, knowing fine well one shell would rip a REX in half. However the people in this film had a much better idea, have the REX chase a group of joggers from 1950 around.

Laughable at Best

posted on 18 Aug 2009

Although this movie plays off a Title in theaters now (10 thousand BC) do not be fooled into thinking it to be the same quality. I always love a good Time travel flick or anything that contains Dinosaurs. Yet this movie was ALMOST a waste of time IF your looking for a serious flick. I found myself laughing more at the movie then being drawn into the story at all. All around, a good B or C movie to chuckle at the directing and acting...and graphics...and plot line....and all other aspects. I think the movie is still worth watching if you are a movie lover, it gives you another notch on your movie belt and the movie does have some pretty neat concepts such as playing off of the Philadelphia Project.

Makes plan 9 from outer space look like pure genus!

posted on 14 Aug 2009

Bad, bad, bad, bad.CG is bad. This isn't bad CG because of budget, this is bad CG because whoever did it was terrible. I've seen better on youtube. There are absolutely no redeeming qualities to this "movie". Anyone and Everyone involved in this movie should be ashamed of themselves, especially people like Michael Gross. How do these terrible movies get well known actors in them? The one thing that is sure, every time the Dinosaurs show up, there are going to be a lot of laughs. I mean real LOL moments when the people are trying to act.Oh Boy, planet raptor is on now. It's already looking as bad as this one. OMG! the dialog is already worse! OMG!!!! the dinosores, they are even the worsers!!!!1!!QQ!1!! BTW, if you are wondering why I am watching this when it's so bad, I'm not really. I record it on my tivo and then skim through it for the "good" parts.

Silly fun romp with familiar faces and hot guys

posted on 10 Aug 2009

The feeder bands of hurricane Gustav released a torrent rain on southwest Florida over the weekend, so it was a b-grade movie weekend!! Starting off with my new favorite bad b-grader 100 Million BC. The faces, both new and old, kept my interest. Chris Atkins of "I got nekked in Blue Lagoon" fame now all grown up to a handsome middle aged dude. Doug McClure anyone? Come on those AI 1970s rich releases, "The Land that Time forget", "At the Earth's Core" et. al. Also starring Michael Gross (Termors) and a bunch of hottie army boys who were nothing more than dino fodder. Main stud Greg Evigan bites it way too early (And gee only one army guy lives but at least he was the cute one).The skinny: Goofy time travel tale loosely tied in with the Philadelphia Experiment storyline. Prof has to sent his baby brother back in time to avert disaster and it takes 50 years to get his brother back and set things right.I loved it. It was silly and fun.Two things however.1. When Gross goes back in time to save his brother Atkins (from the 50s) His brother and the rest of the castaways behave in a very modern 21st century way . . nothing like folks from the 1950s, especially for a scientist and his nerdy brethren. I must ask: was that Atkin's wife cause he was all over her . . . her character.2. The worst dino effects ever. When the Rex would roar I busted a gut laughing. His mouth would shoot open like a pop-up book. I love it!!!Who cares, it rained, I watched, I laughed!

Ready For Reuse

posted on 17 Jul 2009

Watching this made me wonder. When a movie isn't good enough to keep me in the movie, my mind wanders to matters about the experience. I am free to explore the world surrounding the movie. Regular readers ask me why I bother. I seem to watch a lot of movies that I report as a waste of time.Well, they are, and this one is. But this one made me think that we are not far away from the time that ordinary people can make inexpensive movies with effects, and have them be good. No, this one isn't good, and the effects aren't either. But what they've tried with apparently zero talent is pretty ambitious — and its impressive how far they got.For me, what this indicates is that soon we will have films on the web that are pretty decent — perhaps as decent as much of what is in theaters and on TeeVee. Not you-tube cleverness, but long form compositions, which despite its other weaknesses, this actually pulls off. This all became possible because so much of the cinematic vocabulary is set, and we do use clichés and things much like them. This one dabbles in a few, but thankfully avoids a common one:There are two women who are sent back in time, and who end up battle a dino. They aren't babes. They aren't stereotypical in any way. They are attractive in this context, despite being as bad at acting as the men. Because they are attractive simply because they are allowed to be human.Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.

Good story, very bad movie

posted on 11 Jul 2009

The CGI of this thing, Mr. Lucas did a better job back in 1977 when he created Star Wars. Not to mention the camera work. As awful as I have ever seen. Think Godzilla - the one from the fifties. Might be a budget thing.The story however, I liked very much. I must admit I'm a sucker for this kind of s.f. (the kind that touches the current-day world). It's about a secret government project gone very bad. In WO II the US government experimented with a technology that could potentially make objects invisible. In stead, they stumbled on a way to time travel. On the first away mission, things went terribly wrong and the team got stranded about 70 million years ago. The scientist responsible for the project takes this failure personally and for the next 60 years he plans on getting them back. One day he gets his chance and joins a rescue team back into the prehistoric age. When they return however, they bring back more than they hoped for.If you can see past the bad acting, bad camera work and very VERY bad CGI, you could well like this movie. I didn't and the 3/10 points it got from me are purely for the story.

WOW, it's so bad you have to see it...

posted on 07 Jul 2009

Don't let my vote confuse you, the film was awful. But I couldn't stop watching it. The effects was the worst. the acting was terrifying and the plot, not so good. But you know, sometimes a movie is so bad, its starting to be good.. eh, or ... at least hilarious. You should'n waste money on this, but please please please, recommend it to your friends and watch it with them. it will be a blast with a bottle of wine or some bears :D And the best thing is, when the film ends, it has only begun.. OK, maybe I should tell ya all what my favorite thing about the movie is.. when they shake the camera..YOU KNOW YOU LOVE ME XO XO ME

A wonderful and very expensive movie to produce, must have taken years and a cast of thousands.

posted on 07 Jul 2009

The CGI in this particular movie was extreme, I was mesmerised and thought it was real. I jumped of the sofa when the big scary T-Rex (Big Red) floated across the screen. That was a great touch to the film I never expected floating dinosaurs. I love the added detail of the T-Rex not having shadows. Is this because it is a ninja T-Rex and is excellent at not being seen? Or is this because you could not afford anything more expensive than a clip art dinosaur? The use of stock imagery was not at all obvious it was very carefully used and not over used. So my conclusion is that this film sucks but I loved for that reason. "10.000 BC" the actual film made by Hollywood is absolutely crap and cheap compared to this work of art. I can s**t better things than this one.

Total crap is actually being VERY kind to this film

posted on 05 Jul 2009

None of the characters have any depth of believability. The acting is beyond horrible. Even a seasoned TV star like Micheal Gross didn't even try. The "special effects" (I'm putting that in quotes for a reason) is less realistic than junk I've seen teenage kids on YouTube come up with. I'm just glad it was a free rental with coupon but its going to suck having to go back out in the cold to return it...because seriously, this is so bad that if I bought it retail, I would just throw it out. I'm supposed to write 10 lines, but how on earth can I keep going? Okay, so supposedly this modern day team of elite Navy Seals go down in minutes compared to a team of scientists from 59 years earlier. Modern day weapons do absolutely nothing to dinosaurs, yet bows and arrows drop the beasts in a single hit. Just pure idiocy.

Another amazingly bad 'mockbuster' rip-off from The Asylum.

posted on 17 Jun 2009

100 Million BC starts in Los Angeles where a crack team of Navy Seals are briefed by Lieutenant Dorn (Greg Evigan) & scientist Frank Reno (Michael Gross) about a top secret mission to travel back 70 million years into the past using the time machine created by Reno to rescue the last group of soldiers & scientists who used the time machine & were stranded in the past. In no time at all the team lead by Reno are back in the Cretaceous period & have found the few surviving team members from the previous expedition. They head back to the time portal to return home but things go wrong & a huge Tyranosaurus Rex is propelled forward to 2008 & goes on a destructive rampage throughout Los Angeles...Directed by Griff Furst who was probably so embarrassed by the finished product he hid under the pseudonym of Louie Myman (don't forget this is the guy who actually had the nerve to put his real name on the opening credits of I Am Omega (2007)) & is yet another 'mockbuster' from The Asylum, you know the score they take a recent Hollywood blockbuster or two & totally & unashamedly rip it off. In the case of 100 Million BC the title is obviously ripped-off from 10,000 BC (2008) although the story is more of a rip-off of The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) with the whole Tyranosaurus Rex on a rampage through a modern contemporary US city, there's a touch of Stargate (1994) in the way the time travel device looks & works & probably more by accident than design the time travel angle of the film feels like the Doctor Who serial Invasion of the Dinosaurs (1974) where various dinosaurs start appearing in modern day London & if that wasn't enough the plot bears more than a passing resemblance to the British telly series Primeval (2007) which also features time travelling dinosaurs wrecking havoc in moder times. There is not one single original idea or moment in 100 Million BC & that I can guarantee you. This film is so bad in so many ways it's untrue, it's just so badly made & written throughout it's impossible to know where to start. The plot has so many holes it's incredible, like people jumping out of helicopters 30 feet in the air without any safety ropes & literally landing on their feet unhurt, like the idea that someone has to stay behind to close the time portal or it will expand & destroy everything but if that's the case who prevented the time portal in the past destroying everything when the Tyranosaurus Rex ate Reno? Since Reno was dead who turned the time portal off? The whole concept sucks, only Reno knows how to operate the time portal thing? For God's sake it only has three buttons on it, how hard can it be? Erik seems to operate it OK at the end though doesn't he? What if anything actually happened to Reno? The rest of the team would have been stuck, right? I could probably go forever about all the plot holes, bad writing & the general lack of sense & logic but I can't be bothered. On the positive side at the least the film moves along at a decent pace but since it's awful you won't care & it's often unintentionally funny.Before I watched 100 Million BC the worst dinosaur effects I had ever seen were in Doctor Who: Invasion of the Dinosaurs which are literally just plastic toys & while the awful CGI in 100 Million BC aren't as bad as those they are still awful. I would say they are the second worst dinosaur effects I have ever seen, some of 3D models & the animation is absolutely dire beyond belief. It's no exaggeration to say that most regular home PC's could produce better CGI effects & your average computer game has better looking more realistic graphics & animation. The other effects are terrible too, there is one scene set inside a tunnel in which a car is seen travelling backwards in plain sight & it just looks bizarre, there are bags of continuity errors & despite spending six years 70 million years in the past those people still have nice haircuts & are remarkably well groomed! That's another thing, the film states that the team travel to 70 million years BC so why is the film called 100 Million BC? The editing is awful with a lot of scenes so choppy & badly shot it's sometimes hard to understand what's happening.Largely shot in California this has rock bottom production values & is just badly made throughout, I don't wish to sound unkind because I don't believe anyone deliberately sets out to make a bad film but 100 Million BC is simply terrible in all regards. The acting is awful too, a few of the girls are good looking I suppose but that's the best thing that can be said.100 Million BC is a rip-off of several much better films & TV show's, watch the film Jurassic Park or the telly series Primeval or the Doctor Who story Invasion of the Dinosaurs instead as they are all infinitely more enjoyable than this awful film & aren't that different.

I know it has already been said...

posted on 15 Jun 2009

Let me get this straight...My Navy seal team with automatic weapons cannot stop the dinosaurs, but the sharpened sticks can?With all of the traffic on the road system in LA, add a dinosaur on the loose, and we are going to control the traffic with orange cones?At the bridge toward the end (yes, I actually watched this much of it), the soldier is wearing WWII equipment, steel pot, OD green uniform, the works. The Seal team modern weapons, the rest of the military, right out of history. Look at the armored car, really?Then we whistle at the dino to get its attention?All right, commercial, time to get something to drink for sure.T8tr.

Amateur night at the scifi club

posted on 13 Jun 2009

Think the worst SCIFI Channel Original and make it 10 times worse.Scientist who worked on the Philadelphia Experiment takes a team of soldiers through a time machine to 100 million BC where he hopes to rescue friends and family who slipped through time 60 years before. Lots of badly rendered (they look underdone) monsters attack.Think cheap productions. think poor performances except the name actors. Think really awful special effects. This looks more like an amateur production then any sort of paid gig, (which is sad since in the right hands the story might have actually worked). Clearly this was released on video to cash in on 10,000 BC, but should one really bother with a turkey that is made to follow a turkey? Its films like this that make me sad that Mystery science Theater 3000 isn't still on the air.

All this movie is good for is a laugh

posted on 28 May 2009

This review is amateur at best. But you are free to read the following My Dad rented this movie online from blockbuster. Within the first five minutes I knew the movie was going to be either a rip off tragedy, or a great comedy. Starting with the navy dudes in the car waiting like imbeciles for the clock to hit two pm. I also thought the dialogue between the ranks was unreal and rather lame. But that is just the start. The dinosaurs in this movie were nothing great. After the movie I had to check the year this movie was made, and I was shocked to see, "In 2008".I laughed real hard when the survivors were climbing the mountain to escape death, (they are flying!) or when they jump out of the helicopter to fight the monster in L.A. lol {If you decide to watch this movie see if you see Houdini make the helicopter disappear for one or two frames (It's gone, where did it go!?)} There were more errors like the ones listed above but none come to mind at the moment.

My Review

posted on 15 Mar 2009

The government has found a way to travel through time. They tried it once before, which resulted in a number of scientists and soldiers trapped in the age of the dinosaurs.Finally, they worked out the bugs and head back in time to rescue them, but when they return, they've realized they have a stowaway...in the form of a humongous T-rex.Now the T-rex is terrorizing Los Angeles, and they have to find a way to either kill it or send it back to its time before it totally decimates the city.Just a laughable presentation that shouldn't have ever been made. The CGI was so poorly done and the acting was worse than a high school play.

Horrible, terrible, awful

posted on 09 Mar 2009

Don't watch this movie.The cover draws you in and makes you think that there is a big scary dinosaur in the movie when in fact, it's a man in a dinosaur puppet outfit. I'm not joking. In the "extras" that are included in the "special edition", they show how the men got inside the puppets. I can't believe both the director and producer had the nerve to show their faces in the bonus footage. If this sounds funny, it's not. They're trying to make a serious film. What a ripoff. The crew was about 14 people I think. That's how many people made the movie, by the way. The entire crew = 14.I've never made a movie, but I guarantee I can do something better than everything in this "movie". The casting was terrible. The acting was awful. The direction was pitiful. The production was awful. The sounds didn't match the events, the mouths didn't move when the words were being spoken. The soundtrack didn't match the action, and made no effort at building any suspense, ever. The sound effects didn't match the action. A tank sounded like a growl from a dinosaur! There was no emotion or the wrong emotion shown by the actors at various times.The only thing you could possibly get out of it would be a laugh at how terrible it is.I don't recall seeing anything so bad before, ever. It's upsetting that people make money from doing "work" like this. I sincerely hope they lost money, so they won't make any more movies.I will do my best to remember The Asylum production company so I won't make the mistake of again watching anything they make.

Cheap time travel/dino stuff, but fun anyway

posted on 09 Mar 2009

Lots of laughs, but I'm not sure if that was the intention. The cheap CGI dinosaurs are usually the best actors. Their human counterparts are usually so wooden that you'll think they are the CGI characters.Time travel stories are usually fun, if done right. There actually is a story arc here that had potential, posing questions about paradoxes of "changing history" that are the fodder of these flicks, but never develops these ideas. The thing just plays out with a lot of no-name characters getting croaked. Some guy loses some friends on a time travel expedition, so he takes some card-board cut-out "soldiers" with him into the past to effect a rescue. Blood and guts are everywhere, a plant that shoots acid (left over from an unfinished "Alien" sequel), T-Rexes that always swallow a person whole, etc. In the dino lunch-attacks, the victim magically vanishes into CGI heaven an instant before the dino chomps him.Even cheap dinos are fun to watch, though, so the film is fun to watch with the right frame of mind. However, (**mild spoilers follow**) the dumb scene that rips off the worst part of Jurassic Park II is downright idiotic. I love the CGI mixing, where normal traffic seems oblivious to the presence of a 25-foot rampaging beast with big teeth. And the team that chases the thing on foot all over downtown while yelling sophomoric insults at it: classic. Best viewed with popcorn and a good sense of humor.

why Michael why

posted on 27 Feb 2009

How they got Michael gross I will never know This film is just a car crash, really it is, it feels like one, looks like one, sound likes it.I watched this, on my own, expecting, a T-Rex, ripping it's way through LA, tearing people in two, not people and cars going by normally as a giant 20ft T-Rex is wandering aimlessly through the streets with random crew members running around in the background and men with big nets chasing them.And the T-Rex, well, it looks like a CGI iguana mixed with a chicken, that has eaten A lot of sugar, seriously, it jumps like 30ft into the air and eats a helicopter.But, all these awesome scenes are done in crappy CGI.Seriously, Michael, loved you in Tremors, why degrade yourself to this horse crap of a film.I am now begging the guys at the Asylum pictures, please stop making movies.

Good

posted on 23 Feb 2009

For a free movie on a Sunday night it was pretty good. Remember the B-Movies of the 80's - well you're not going to pay 14 bucks a ticket to see a movie like this in the 2000's, so the Sci-Fi channel is good enough to produce and show it for us, and I'm grateful for that.Lets face it, any time travel movie has more holes in the plot than a cheese grater, and this was no exception.I've read people bashing the special effects.....they are no worse or better than most of these types movies, namely the "dinosaur" running around. But there were some good ones as well, like when the "transport" goes horribly wrong. Explosions, crushed cars, not too bad.Greg Evigan (alias BJ without the Bear) is a great actor and he barely rolled out of bed for this role....seriously. I thought he was going to be the main actor. The "Family Ties" dad played a good scientist, I'd like too see him in a lot more roles like that, even on the big screen, I didn't have a problem with him as well.Reno - the real main character, at least since his introduction 1/2 way through the movie was OK. I knew him from somewhere and it bugged me till I checked IMDb to see he was the kid from Blue Lagoon. I was glad to see he was still acting.I think the "writing" could have been better if anything........you had at least 3 experienced "good" actors, yet it was tough to get anything going.I say, watch it one lazy day when nothing else is happening and you'll enjoy it.

10,000 BC rip off, more like a Jurrasic Park rip off

posted on 19 Feb 2009

This is indeed one of the worst film, I have ever seen. Everything about this film was just so bad.The first is the obvious. The special effects were just laughable and cheap. The dinosaur in the cover, I take it is the big red dinosaur that escapes his/her own time period and comes in the present. It looks nothing like the dino in the cover. They must have wasted half the budget making the cover. I do have to admit, the cover is very eye catching for such a horrible movie but that isn't part of the movie so it dosen't count.Its not just the dinosaurs that are madly put together, the way the helicopter moves while trying to stop big red is hilarious because it was so unrealistic. I've seen a remote control helicopter move more realistic that that.The actors were all terrible. Micheal Gross of all people had the guts to star in crap. His character is very different than the character we all know from Tremors and love. The mad gun veteran Burt Gummer. In here, he is a some pussy scientist. I guess money is money.The Asylum really have put down their cash-ins by making rip-offs from famous blockbusters.Overall this is a terrible movie, it is so bad, it is difficult for me to write a proper review. If you need a film with some of the cheapest CGI works ever, see this.

Severely flawed and not that enjoyable

posted on 30 Jan 2009

"100 Million BC" is a certainly fun if flawed giant dinosaur entry.**SPOILERS**Arriving in Los Angeles, Lt. Robert Peet, (Stephen Blackehart) and his team Manriquez, (Aaron Stigger) Burke, (Nick McCallum) Jones, (Daniel Ponsky) Stubbs, (Phil Burke) and Myrick, (Prince Pheenix Wade) learn from Dr. Frank Reno, (Michael Gross) that they have been gathered for a rescue mission to go back into the Cretaceous Period to recover stranded personnel from an earlier mission. Arriving in prehistoric Argentina, they set about on their mission and find themselves under attack from the local wildlife, running into the survivors of the rescue mission in the process. Desperate to return to the present time, they try to get through their world in order to return back to the present. With the prehistoric life taking it's toll on the team, they manage to return to their true time, bringing back one of the predators in the process to the present time as well. Determined not to let it get out of control, they get together to combat it and take the giant monster out.The Good News: There was some good stuff to this one at times. One of the best features is the time spent back in the prehistoric world, which is quite fun and entertaining on it's own. From the fun of the location that works well in the situations presented, as well as the rather cool scene where the raptors are stalking the group and picking them off one-by-one using the jungle foliage as cover during these attempts, which is a lot of fun and definitely worthwhile moments, and the chasing through the woods out into the caves as a result allows for the introduction of the survivors in a nice sequence as well. There's also a few rather nice chase sequences with the giant dinosaur in here that manages to make for a thrilling chase at times. The fact that the last half of the film consists of the dinosaur rampaging through the modern world is easily the best part, due to several key points. From the big action scenes involving the army tracking the creature through the streets to the survivors' quest to get the creature under control mixed nicely with the beasts' semi-destructive rampage makes for some pretty good times. Along with the pretty enjoyable resolution that manages to end entirely with a lot of fun. These scenes are certainly among the best in the film. The last plus in here is the film's rather advanced way of incorporating the time-travel issue into the story, which is quite nice. The detail with the paradoxes is well-done, there's a rather accurate speech at the beginning which tells everything that is needed to, and the scenes where the transportation shows them welded into the surroundings due to the inability to know where they are is a great sign. These few points here are the film's best.The Bad News: This is a quite poor entry for several reasons. Part of it is due to the fact that this film is just so cheap that it ruins whatever good could've come from the story. Not only are the special effects, if they could indeed be called that, are so poor but it's hard to believe that these could've been allowed into a film to begin with. The dinosaur is the worst example, as, despite being called Big Red by the cast for various reasons that are apparent whenever they are back in the prehistoric sequences, shots of the dinosaur in the modern world depict it as being green all over without a hint of red coloring. That alone is quite grievous, but then there's the other factor that the creature tends to change not only size, but also shape. Part of the time it's got traditional dinosaur proportions and seems very evenly built, others have it shrunk into some very odd designs and looks so that the entire body can be shown which distorts the design into a barely- recognizable form. That happens a lot more often than actually keeping the same size and shape, and since it comes so often into the film, there's a lot of times with this one feeling that way. It also doesn't help much that there wasn't a whole lot of times, even without it changing so frequently, that the dinosaur here looked realistic. This one here looked even cheaper than most of the usual Sci-Fi Channel Creature Features, and it tends to stick out so frequently in here that there's just no way around how cheap this one looks, and that takes some relatively big times which isn't often here. Aside from the main dino, there's plenty more in here that shows this problem. One of the worst segments is the attack at the river, which starts promising enough with the poison plant attack before it all goes south. Upon entering the water to clean up, they get attacked, but it's not so much edited beyond comprehension so much as distorted so as to be completely unaware that what's being shown is from a movie. It's just so poor that it's impossible to really call it bad but instead becomes just utterly terrible and completely worthless. The last problem here is the fact that the ending here makes no sense whatsoever, and yet explaining it would take even longer than trying to figure out what happened to it. None of them, though, are as bad and damaging as the terrible CGI is to the film. These here are the biggest problems.The Final Verdict: Not quite an unmitigated disaster, but still pretty close due to the rather large and detrimental flaws on display. The good points here do make it somewhat enjoyable, though this one will end up turning off a ton because of the severity of those flaws, leaving those one only for the interested or curious.

Page:
6319 Movies Available for Instant Download!

Movies-Tv.com definitely will be your favorite place to download movies. You will not need any additional software or codecs. You'll own every movie downloaded. Download speed is just AMAZING! It's so easy to download movies now!