Bachelor Party 2: The Last Temptation Movie
Storyline
TAGLINES PLOT SUMMARY
Ron is thrown the ultimate bachelor party by his future brother-in-law Todd.
| Josh Cooke | Ron |
| Greg Pitts | Jason |
| Harland Williams | Derek |
| Warren Christie | Todd |
| Sara Foster | Melinda |
| Danny Jacobs | Seth |
| Max Landwirth | Tommy |
| Emmanuelle Vaugier | Eva |
| Karen Gordon | Autumn |
| Steven Crowley | Billy |
| Audrey Landers | Bettina |
| Mauricio Sanchez | Plumber |
| Chay Santini | Betty |
| Major Mike Russell | Father |
| Sandra Seeling | Gerda |
| James Ryan |
5.20 out of 10 (721 votes)
Visitor Reviews
Try to forget this movie exists
posted on 27 Jun 2009When I first heard they were doing a sequel to one of my favorite '80's films, Bachelor Party, i was skeptical. When I heard no one from the original would be in it, I thought it blasphemy. When I started watching it & realized they were trying to do a remake, I found it outright heresy!! All the laughs and memorable parts of the original all gone replaced with tired worn-out jokes, lame dialog, and mediocre acting. The plot is the same as the first, guy's getting married, his friends throw him a party, other jealous guy tries to break up the wedding, yada, yada, yada. I hang my head in shame not only because I watched this laugh-free movie (I was tricked by a friend), but also because it exists in the first place. The abundant nudity is the only reason I didn't slip into a coma.My Grade: F Eye Candy: Paula LaBaredas, Arianna Coltellacci, Erika Smith , Claudia Costa, Diana Vilskaya, Mariann Gavelo, Dena Carman, Ashley Totin, La Trice Perry, Jennifer Steele all get topless DVD Extras: Commentary by Director James Ryan and actors Warren Christie, Harland Williams, Danny Jacobs, & Josh Cooke; 18 deleted scenes; Making of featurette; 'Analysis of a stripper fight'; Gag reel, Theatrical trailer, and Trailers for "The Onion Movie", & "In the Name of the King" (another 'winner' *shudders*)
Just an excuse to show nudity
posted on 07 Jun 2009Now I recently had the viewing pleasure to watch the hilarious comedy Bachelor Party, one of my new favorite comedies, laughed until it just hurt type of movies. So I naturally wanted to see the sequel, hoping it would have the same laughs, but instead Bachelor Party 2: The Last Temptation is made by the American Pie generation where it's tasteless and defeats the hole purpose of the first film. Yeah, the first film has nudity, but it doesn't show in every single scene. Also the plot is exactly the same from the first, it's not always a complaint with me, but this could have been a little more original. The only thing is that I'm glad that at least no old actors from the original appear in this movie, because it would have been cheesy or really silly looking.Ron and Melinda are engaged, after only 2 months of dating, everyone is against it. Melinda has a rich family, but they're pretty happy with Ron, and Melinda's brother, Todd is scared that Ron will take his job. So they go out on a weekend to Miami for a bachelor party and Todd is going to make sure that he'll trap Ron into a picture that will make Melinda change her mind about the marriage.Bachelor Party 2: The Last Temptation has a couple laughs here and there, but over all fails to deliver what the first film accomplished. These guys, Ron's friends, were more obnoxious than likable, except for Seth, he was kinda funny. The only likable characters other than Seth is Ron and Melinda, everyone else just more or less gets on your nerves. You wanna watch this film? Just watch Girls Gone Wild, it's the same thing only it doesn't try to pretend that it's a film. Stick to the original Bachelor Party, that's the movie that's going to get you in tears of laughter.3/10
Josh Cooke probably won't win two Oscars . . .
posted on 03 Feb 2009. . . but not everyone can be Tom Hanks, title character of 1984's original Bachelor Party. Josh Cooke as the remakes' groom-to-be is pretty much the straight man to everyone else appearing in this farce. However, this is a movie that could have been better had it not chosen to straddle the fence between gross-out comedy (e.g.--its unforgettable poopy diaper splattered on a bowling ball) and erotic comedy (e.g.--two horny guys unknowingly crashing a women's meeting of the Sex Addicts Anonymous group). The DVD has many deleted scenes and extended gags, several of which are as funny as anything in the feature. Too bad the baby potty wasn't confined there.
Let's step back before we destroy this one....
posted on 24 Jan 2009Now, we all know that comedy sequels that change actors, and that are made years after the original, are usually disastrous. Ski School 2 ...Caddyshack 2.Dumb and DUmberer...Major League 2. ....I'll stop there before I have bad nightmares. THis movie is actually MUCH better than I expected. Is it great?...NO!.....but it's definitely not horrible. The cast has an adequate group of known funny-men and the acting in general is passable. Doesn't disappoint on the nudity and party front...living up to its' namesake. Most of the humor is dirty.. as are the mojito's and martini's. Ratings wise I'd say it's just shy of the original, but it's worth a view for a guys' night in with a case of brewskies. 54-100
Not bad but also not good
posted on 10 Jan 2009I had the pleasure of viewing this movie early and I have to say I thought that it was going to be boring and wondered how could they ever improve upon the 1984 version of Bachelor Party starring Tom Hanks, which I thought was pretty good...I was right...In all honesty I thought it could have been better...Sure there were some funny moments but it just didn't seem to hit the mark with me...The acting was OK and the storyline pretty well follows the original but I think it could have been so much better...This movie I'd say is for teens and the young of heart; full of female bodies, alcohol and sex...It's just another typical run of the mill party movie that has been done over and over again. 4/10 is my vote for this one.
Horrible tasteless movie.
posted on 30 Jun 2008I wonder how much this movie actually has got to do with the 1984 movie "Bachelor Party", starring Tom Hanks. Is this movie even an official sequel? This movie is lacking in every department and you're obviously better off not watching it.For a comedy this movie simply isn't good or funny enough. It relies mostly on the character's their stereotypical assessments, rather then the movie actually features some good, original and funny moments.Of course there also is very little story present and the movie nude breast than script pages. You just keep waiting for things to finally start off. There is a main plot line in it somewhere but that one is so terribly unoriginal and gets executed so poorly in the movie that it feels more as if it's something non-existent. I guess there even is a message and moral story in it somewhere but this again is so terribly unoriginal and poorly done in the movie that it simply does not work out.It's basically a typical teenage comedy, with lots of sex jokes and nudity, only without the teenage main characters, which makes the story all the more sad and tasteless. The movie makes some really wrong jokes, that are misplaced for any type of movie.I regret ever watching this.3/10
A nice surprise
posted on 06 Aug 2009I thought when i bought this ex-rental DVD, this gonna be a crappy movie, but still enjoyable, and for 3 euros. But when I put it in and was watching it, I really liked it. It was funny, characters where funny. I won't win any prices but an entertaining movie for a night with your friends. But the point people give that movie only is made so they could put nudity in it, is kinda lame. It's also in the 80's one (the nudity). It is part of those kind of movies. Where the nudity is totally useless are in the movies from the makers of epic movie, etc. they put a naked girl in a scene which got not any purpose.If you like these genre movies, this is a must-have (but only if it cost a few bucks)