Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire Movie
| Resolution | Size | Download | ||
|
1440x600 | 8128.36 MiB | 1080p | |
|
1280x528 | 8132.38 MiB | 720p | |
|
720x288 | 1596.46 MiB | hidivx | |
|
592x236 | 796.59 MiB | divx | |
|
480x202 | 723.13 MiB | ipod | |
|
320x128 | 331.35 MiB | hpc | |
Storyline
TAGLINES
"Difficult times lie ahead, Harry."
Dark And Difficult Times Lie Ahead.
On November 18 Everything Will Change.
Harry's fourth summer and the following year at Hogwarts are marked by the Quidditch World Cup and the Triwizard Tournament, in which student representatives from three different wizarding schools compete in a series of increasingly challenging contests. However, Voldemort's Death Eaters are gaining strength and even creating the Dark Mark giving evidence that the Dark Lord is ready to rise again. In the unsuspecting lives of the young wizard and witches at Hogwarts the competitors are selected by the goblet of fire, which this year makes a very surprising announcement: Hogwarts will have two representatives in the tournament, including Harry Potter! Will Harry be able to rise to the challenge for the Tri Wizard Tournament while keeping up with school or will the challenges along with Voldemort's rebirth be too much for the young hero?
| Eric Sykes | Frank Bryce |
| Timothy Spall | Wormtail |
| David Tennant | Barty Crouch Junior |
| Daniel Radcliffe | Harry Potter |
| Emma Watson | Hermione Granger |
| Rupert Grint | Ron Weasley |
| Mark Williams | Arthur Weasley |
| James Phelps | Fred Weasley |
| Oliver Phelps | George Weasley |
| Bonnie Wright | Ginny Weasley |
| Jeff Rawle | Amos Diggory |
| Robert Pattinson | Cedric Diggory |
| Jason Isaacs | Lucius Malfoy |
| Tom Felton | Draco Malfoy |
| Stanislav Ianevski | Viktor Krum |
| Mike Newell |
7.60 out of 10 (107558 votes)
Visitor Reviews
It cut out a lot
posted on 30 Aug 2009I did not like this movie at all. It cut out many characters and it only focused on the tournament. It was only 2.5 hours long for a 7?? page book but the Lord of the rings was 3 hour for a 300-400 page book. Personnaly I think they could have done a lot better. They could have also included Dobby and Winky in it. I know they had to shorten and make it good for younger children but still they could have added more. It had good special effects and all that but now days all they care about is making money. The book was a lot , lot better than the movie. Overall I would give this movie a 1. I would give it 7 for special effects and a 1-2 for following the storyline. I personally did not like it at all.
Good Movie, but I am not happy
posted on 28 Aug 2009I had really high hopes when it came to seeing HP4, but I wasn't happy with the end result. Now I am not saying that it's a bad movie, I will probably go and see it again. But I LOVED the book SO much and wish there was some more of it in the movie. The story went by incredibly fast, first task, ball, second task, third task.Here are a few of the things I wish had made it:The first half of the book!!!!!!!!! The letter from the Weasley's, the floo powder fascia, and the World Cup!!!!Molly Weasley, there is a great part there at the end where she comforts Harry and he feels like it is the first time someone has held him like a mother.More Rita Skeeter.Well I have had my rant, go and watch the movie and enjoy it, I did and will again just frustrated about a few things.
what the heck? they save face with number 3 only to right back to crap...
posted on 28 Aug 2009clearly...the vision of a director is key in the interpretation of any film.harry potter 3 was a clear departure from the prior two, and in my opinion saved the series!so now that the producers have a good film under their belt, they go right back to the same sticky sweet formula with just a touch of dark edge...and lose everything.totally changed the book...and it's a pivotal book in the series...how they are gonna cover that in the next film remains to be seen..but they'll need to do so..unless they just wanna change everything.dumbledore is a buffoon in this one...in number 3 he was quirky at best, but damn..in this one he's just plain befuddled.and the end, the scene that should have been the most dramatic and drawn out...the rebirth of voldemort, was totally rushed, so they could add a big dragon chace that never happened in the damn book.anywho....it's a crap movie...just watch number 3 over again and imagine the same director doing a version of number 4...you'll enjoy it more.
Easily the greatest Harry Potter movie ever.
posted on 26 Aug 2009This movie was great. A lot of stuff was left out of the movie, but the way the movie is put together, you won't notice anything is gone. Throughout the entire movie, my butt was glued to my chair, and my eyes were glued to the screen. The movie was able to keep you watching it through every scene, either with action, humor, suspense, drama, or just great special effects. There was plenty of action in the movie in the form of three tasks that Harry must complete. The First task was awesome, with Harry having to fly around Hogwarts castle, trying to avoid a fire-breathing dragon. In the second task Harry must go into the lake and save Ron, while being attacked by many different sea-dwelling creatures. In the third task he must find the Triwizard cup within a MASSIVE maze that comes to life and attacks him and the other champions. As I said above, there is a lot of action in this movie, but I'm not complaining, and neither will you.There is tons of humor that will have you on the floor laughing your butt off. The humor in this one is more adult than in the others, and also a lot funnier. This movie centers a lot more on the trio, and it shows them going through puberty and developing new emotions, which adds some funny moments. Though these scenes are funny they will also hint at who will end up together later on in the series. The Weasley twins are featured a lot more in this movie, and it adds a lot of laughs to an otherwise dark movie. But don't think the movie is all about action and humor. There is a great plot. To sum it up, the dark lord Voldemort is rising in power, and the entire magical world is aware of his presence. Harry has a nightmare about Voldemort, who is trying to get to Harry, in an attempt to regain his body. Deatheaters, Voldemort's followers, attack during the Quidditch World Cup, and someone sends up the Dark Mark, Voldemort's sign. Later, at Hogwarts Dumbledore announces that Hogwarts will host the Triwizard tournament, a tournament where one champion from 3 schools will fight in 3 deadly tasks. The three champions are: Cedric Diggory from Hogwarts, Fleur Delacour from Beauxbatons, and Victor Krum from Durmstrang. But after the three champions were picked, another champion was picked. This other champion is(you guessed it) Harry Potter, who is to young to have entered his name. Why was his name entered, and who did it? You will have to see to find out. The acting in this movie is great. When Ron is angry at Harry for getting to be a champion, you can really feel Ron's hatred towards Harry. Even if you despise Hermione, you just can't help feel sorry for her when Ron practically ruins what should have been the best night of her life. And only a heartless devil wouldn't be sad when Harry returns from the third task with the dead body of one of the other champions. Brendan Gleeson is great as Alastor "Mad-Eye" Moody, a former Auror(dark wizard catcher) and the new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher. Micheal Gambon is a better Dumbledore in this film than he was in the last(though he still isn't as good as Richard Harris). Ralph Fiennes plays a great Voldemort, and even though he didn't look like I expected him to, you will not doubt that he is the perfect person to play him. The roles of the adults are lessened in this movie, as it is more about the kids, but they still give great performances. Matthew Lewis is also great as Neville Longbottom who gets a much larger role in this film than in the others. Overall the acting is outstanding.The special effects in this movie are awesome, the best special effects ever. The dragon in the first task is the most realistic looking dragon you will have ever seen on film. The mer-people during the second task are great, and the living maze in the third task is truly incredible. The Dark Mark is frightening, and Voldemort's resurrection at the end is spectacular, though slightly disturbing. These special effects are probably the best any one has ever seen.This movie is dark, the darkest movie so for. The whole movie is really dark, but you really must see the ending to truly understand why it was given a PG-13 rating. It wasn't really that scary to me, but in my theater four families with younger kids had to leave because it was to scary for them. One kid even started screaming and crying during Voldemort's resurrection. Don't take younger kids to this movie unless you want them to have nightmares. This movie is also very emotional, and if you are the type of person who cries easily, you might want to take a box of tissues with you.Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the best movie in the series, and in my opinion the best movie ever. You must watch it.
The best so far...
posted on 26 Aug 2009I am happy to say that the Goblet of Fire truly made up for the disastrous Prizoner of Azkaban. Mike Newell brilliantly guided the cast into a realm that no other Potter movie has been. There was a new level of chemistry among the acting group, which made me love them all the more. I will say that the limited involvement of Dumbledore was a wise move. Michael Gambon did a horrible job as Dumbledore. His acting was very contradictory to the typical demeanor of the Dumbledore we have all gotten to know and love. What I saw was not the temperate and amiable wizard Rowling created. Rather he was a bellowing man who normally would make Harry apprehensive to approach or trust with his concerns.Overall, though, the movie was the best so far and I can only hope that the next will be even better.
Not bad but...
posted on 26 Aug 2009Overall, I liked the film but just couldn't get over the feeling that they cut too much from the book. There were a lot of characters who didn't appear. For new characters that were included, they didn't seem to have much depth. In fact, even some of the main characters other Harry lacked depth. This book in the series is supposed to show a major transition in the adolescent development of students, but aside from the fact that they're obviously older, so much was either minimized or left out entirely. This was inevitable given the length of the book, but even so, I felt that there was just way too much missing. I hope that they'll do an extended version DVD with a lot more scenes added.
Absolutely Amazing!
posted on 24 Aug 2009Everyone was perfect for the parts they played and so many times it's exactly like how I imagined it in the book! It is also way more action and the digital effects are fantastic! Ralph Finnes is perfect for the Role of Voldemort. The movie is also much more grown up than the other 3 Movies. This is my favorite Harry Potter movie Yet. Some fans may be disappointed for how fast it rushes through the story-line but the redeeming qualities are the amount of work they put in to the entire film. This film also is more comical and has more joke than the other movies. Prepare to be sitting for a long time because of the length of the movie. Other than that I highly recommend going to see this movie!
Not the best, but not the worst either
posted on 22 Aug 2009I thought this movie was well done and fairly true to the book. Book 4 is my favorite so far of the Harry Potter books and I found the movie to be very good. So many people are upset because not everything from the book made it into the movie but realistically if they did that the movie would be 4+ hours long and then you would complain about that! The books are getting darker and so the movies naturally should follow suit. The main part of the Goblet of Fire is the Triwizard Tournament and most of the movie was concentrated on this. They skipped quickly through the beginning of the book so they could spend more time on what was most important. The scenes with the tasks were great, very dark, very gripping. I recommend this movie to anyone who is a fan of the Harry Potter series. But if you want all the details, read the book first!!
the best movie of all time!!!!
posted on 20 Aug 2009Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is easily my favorite film of all time. The special FX, the acting, the music…almost everything was superb. I only had a major problem with Michael Gambon, who plays Dumbledore. His interpretation of Dumbledore is appalling; he is just a headmaster, and almost violent (like when Harry's name comes out of the Goblet of Fire), he's not the Dumbledore that Richard Harris was. If I had my way, Gambon would be sacked immediately. He actually said in an interview that he hasn't read the books, and he has no interest; he just reads the script and does what he's told; there's no interpretation. Basically, he's just in it for the money; people like that shouldn't acting, because acting is interpreting something to make it your own performance. But enough about Gambon; the rest of the movie was terrific. Patrick Doyle wrote one of the best musical scores I've ever heard. Mike Newell took Steve Kloves's screenplay and worked wonders with it; he is the first actually accomplished director this series has seen, and it shows. The FX were wonderful, good enough to rival those in King Kong. The acting was superb, ten times better than in Prisoner of Azkaban. Rupet Grint and Emma Watson were great, even better than in the first three films. Brendan Gleeson was perfect as the eccentric Mad-Eye Moody; David Tenant was excellent as Barty Crouch Jr. Alan Rickman, as Snape, was great, as always. Jason Issacs was excellent, as he always is, as Lucius Malfoy. Katie Leung was great as Cho; Miranda Richardson was hilarious as Rita Skeeter; and sadly, we see very, very little of Gary Oldman, who was great in Prisoner of Azkaban. But my favorite performances were by Timothy Spall, as Wormtail (perfect choice!), Robert Pattinson as Cedric Diggory (he was charming, and handsome, and it was heart breaking to see him die near the end of the film!). Daniel Radcliffe, who actually had himself cry to film the heartbreaking scene when Cedric's body is brought back to Hogwarts, was superb. His acting has improved so much over the years; he was absolutely amazing. But, as much as I loved Daniel Radcliffe's performance, the performance that stole the movie, and, in my opinion, the greatest performance by any actor, of all time, was Ralph Fiennes as the evil Lord Voldemort. The makeup and digital effects combined with Fiennes's sinister performance made the graveyard scene absolutely terrifying for me to sit through; he was better here than even in Schindler's List! If any actor deserves an Oscar for best actor, it would have to be Ralph Fiennes (unfortunately, the snobs at Hollywood fail to acknowledge true magic like the entity that is Ralph Fiennes these days). Forget about Brokeback Mountain; Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the best movie of the year.
Disappointing and lacks Cuaron's magical vision
posted on 20 Aug 2009I had high hopes for this latest instalment of the Harry Potter series, most especially after the superlative production of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban with Alfonso Cuaron at the helm. Cuaron's film was a genuine cinematic treat, often visually stunning, darkly atmospheric, strongly-acted, emotionally satisfying with a realistic central theme charting Harry's personal growth and his evolving sense of identity. Emma Watson was excellent here as Hermione, and her scenes with Daniel Radcliffe (Harry), most particularly during the brilliantly directed Time Turner sequence were a stand-out. There were multiple visual clues, gags, motifs, clever filmic transitions to delight during this film, ensuring a multi-layer narrative - more than mere popcorn action and trite adherence to the book. As for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - everything I can say about Cuaron's film cannot now be said. Indeed, it is an almost complete reversal. The film is not as impressive visually - indeed, it borders on dull and plodding. The brooding darkness first instigated by Cuaron is still apparent, but has been dimmed to an oddly greenish, medieval hue which pervades throughout. Cuaron's palette was more blues and greys and silvers, to often startling effect. Newell's dank colours stifle and subdue the film. There is abundant use of silver at the Yule Ball, but even this episode lacked vitality I felt, which is a big shame as Newell was most surefooted when tackling material which pertained to the teenage angsty relationships - basically human interest stuff was handled pretty well, and often to mildly comic effect. As a result, Rupert Grint as Ron, and Matthew Lewis as Neville, came off best in this production. I have not been impressed with Grint in particular in former films, but here he put in a strong performance - I guess Newell was more secure and at ease in handling Grint's major material.The same could not be said for Emma Watson, who was shrill and annoying - much more so even than her character Hermione who can herself be hugely irritating in the book (albeit lovable). Gambon's hysterical Dumbledore was quite dreadfully overplayed - in Cuaron's version Gambon just about managed to maintain an even keel - here, Newell allowed him to melodramatically fall overboard. In truth, precious few performances had much to recommend themselves. Maggie Smith was competent as always, ditto Rickman's Snape (although horridly underwritten). Barty Crouch Snr and Jnr were much less effective (this saddens me as fan of David Tennent). Gleason's Mad Eye Moody was a wasted opportunity, and his eye decoration was simply ludicrous and not in the least bit disturbing.The narrative flow was episodic and clunky. The early stages of the film actually dragged: The World Cup debacle resulted in a completely disproportionate and unwarranted apocalyptic landscape, the introduction to the TriWizard tournament was wrecked by egregious over-acting from Dumbledore. Events mildly picked up during parts of the tournament itself, and the dragon sequence was particularly impressive. The bathroom scene with Moaning Myrtle was well-done (again, back into safe semi-comic Newell territory) and although much was lost from the original which would have boosted the suspense factor considerably, the maze had its moments. The final graveyard sequence, however, was OTT rubbish, almost completely devoid of suspense and emotion. I had looked forward to the recreation of Voldemort, but this was one hell of a letdown. Fiennes deserved better.I did wonder though if Newell had been slightly handicapped by the book too in this respect - the evocation of Voldemort was always going to be tricky to handle. Perhaps Cuaron was lucky in not having to handle this aspect of Harry Potter at all - events, fears were grounded in reality - and frankly the Dementor's kiss, and indeed, the ghastly spectral Dementors themselves, feasting on our fears and phobias, are probably the most frightening inventions in the entire series to date. Voldemort is a bit too much of a cartoon figure - the personification of evil is probably better left unstated, left to the imagination, the subjective. As a mind-possessing force in the next instalment (The Order of the Phoenix), Voldemort is more sinister, more terrible. Perhaps then we will get a better film.
The worst yet...
posted on 16 Aug 2009I'm a fan of both the books and the movies and I was crushingly disappointed when i saw this movie. I thought maybe I didn't enjoy it because i went to see it with my little sister who ran round than cinema for a lot of the movie but that unfortunately this was far, far from the truth. This movie was poor in almost every way possible, the lack of story in the movie, the bad editing, the bad direction,its only slight 'saving grace' was the acting which i must admit was pretty damned good. However does not make up for the fact that this was the worst movie yet!
Flashy Superficial Treatment with Damsels in Distress
posted on 16 Aug 2009At first blush the movie comes across well; but by the end you are left feeling you watched a highlight reel. Others I have spoken with mentioned getting restless in the last 45 minutes; which they hadn't done in the previous movies. The movie has great special effects, is sufficiently dark to equate to the book; but simply does not maintain a well-edited flow of a story. Granted, the movie needed to cut a good portion of the book to fit into the time constraints. Sadly, the choice of scenes and script did a mediocre choice of what to put on film.A key element of the book was the attack at the match grounds and subsequent deaths, all part of the plan for "ethnic cleansing" and Voldemort's return. The panic this engendered was dealt with to a mild degree during the course of the movie; but never actually explained. Instead, you had a random attack by people in hoods, a death here, a death there, etc. No real rationale was given, nor a hint that they were related. Those having not read the novels are left without essential basic information to the plot.One glaring trend throughout the book is that the director apparently has a very low opinion of the female of the species; as opposed to the portrayal in the novels. The primary purpose of females in the movie appeared to be as arm-hangers and damsels in distress tied to the track awaiting rescue. Emma Watson was primarily a love-struck water-carrier and Clémence Poésy was a simpering incompetent either getting trounced or needing rescue. Even little niggling things like showing the dragons of the three male competitors; but not the female became noticeable in the running trend. For reasons of full disclosure, I am a father with a daughter. I, like other such fathers, do notice these things.All in all, it's worth seeing (once). Although, I can understand why Mike Newell was paid one-tenth of what Chris Columbus was paid.
Movie effects brilliant, movie plot, dreadful
posted on 16 Aug 2009An awful adaption of Rowlings stunning masterpiece. Everything is far too unlike the book. I completely understand the crew's predicament. Trying to condense a 400 page novel into a movie is a difficult task, but they still could have made the movie a bit more like the book. Plot holes are like unavoidable craters in this film. Certain aspects of the film will only be understood by readers of the book's as they have previous knowledge. Movie-goers won't have a clue what is going on. The attempt to change Rowling's character's attributes crashed and burned and book fans will be able to distinctively see subjects and objects that are missing from the movie. I do though give credit to the crew for the effects and direction of cast but really should have focused more on the "true" detail of the movie through the book instead of adding extra nit-bits which were not needed in the movie.
harry potter 4
posted on 14 Aug 2009In the 4th installment of J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series, Mike Newell ("Four Weddings and a Funeral") takes over as director for Alfonso Cuarόn. 10 minutes into the movie, at the Quidditch World Cup, it's obvious that Newell is aiming to make the movie scarier than the other three, when we see a group of guys in skeleton masks and hoods walking through camp lighting everything on fire. This is most likely what earned the movie its PG-13 rating.Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) wakes up from a dream of an old man who gets murdered by Wormtail, Voldermort's assistant. Harry wakes up, and he's at Ron Weasly's house. This is one part I don't like, because I enjoy the parts where Harry is at his aunt and uncle's house. Right away, he's at school. In the book, this is about 10 chapters long. As soon as he's at school, the other two schools, Beuxbatons and Durmstrang, arrive. Right after that, we hear about the Tri-wizard tournament, which, in the book, took much longer and was developed better.Most of the stuff I look forward to in the other movies, such as the House Sorting, and the Dursley's, and the banquet at the beginning of the year, were all left out, because the Tournament takes up most of the movie. One of the most popular characters, Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane), is barely in this movie at all. Some characters new to the story are Fleur Delacour (Clemence Poesy), the representative in the tournament from Beuxbatons, Viktor Krum (Stanislav Ianevski) the representative from Durmstrang, and Professor "Mad-Eye" Moody (Brendan Gleeson), a new, extremely paranoid teacher. Also, Katie Leung plays Cho Chang, and Robert Pattinson as Cedric Diggory, the other Hogwarts champion.There are two problems with basing a movie on a book. One is, people who have the books memorized will be upset that the movie doesn't follow the book exactly. If it had, it would've been about 8 hours long. Already, at 2 hours and 37 minutes, it's much longer than average. The second problem is, if you read the book, then go see the movie, there's no surprise. You know what's going to happen, so you spend the time waiting for the end, and you don't enjoy the movie as much.
The Boy Who Lived becomes Legend
posted on 12 Aug 2009This film is truly remarkable. Fabulous clean edits, good use of colour, a brighter and more cheerful look than the last, but a dark story all the same. It deserves its 12a rating, as there are some scenes that even I found disturbing. Fiennes Voldemort is truly terrifying, but harder still it is to see Cedric Diggory die. Moving most of all is the scene in which Harrys parents come back to him in a beautiful vision, the moment at which my eyes watered! This film has everything- romance (cho was very well cast and Likable), edge of your seat thrills (the maze) and heart wrenching sadness. All the actors have come of age, including character Harmione who has stopped whining (appears that in this film, thats Rons job). JK will be delighted to see the book so well framed, but a word of warning to fans of the literary Potter- there's no Hogsmeade and very little Sirius... for he is star of the next movie. This installment of the saga will go down as the greatest, mark my words. Simply beautiful.
director needs to go back to film school
posted on 12 Aug 2009This movie really should of been a two part series. The movie is so choppy that if people hadn't of read the book they would not of known what the hell was going on. It was like they pulled out the best scenes, some one liners, and tried to work around the character relationships. I was glad to watch the movie, but very disappointed with what the directed and producers decided to do. The book is so massive now that the movie should of been two parts. Not only that, but the book was a major turning point in the series. The first three were mainly back story, but in the fourth, we find out a lot more about Harry and the other characters as they grow up. I also agree and wonder about why they let Dumblerdore lose it? He is always calm and it was very out of character to have him shake Harry. They really should of known better. I think many more people will be disappointed like me.
outstanding performance
posted on 12 Aug 2009WOW! I saw it the night before it came out the day it came out and 3 times more! It was put together beautifully,I just love it.The exciting this is it comes out on DVD April 11 2006.Wow 3 months from now!I just love it~!I think they needed to add a few more things they left-out,like Pigwigen and S.P.E.W. (((Not spew Ron)) (((lol))) but hey there's always deleted Sean's!So look for it in April! I am writing so much cause it says 10 lines so I'm trying my best to fill-up this space.Oh I don't know if Tom Felton is playing Draco Malfoy anymore,cause if you lookup Harry Potter 5 you'll see his name is not on the cast list!What are they going to do??They start filming in February.Good luck!
They outdid themselves!
posted on 10 Aug 2009I finally saw the new Harry Potter movie last night. I had my doubts as to how good the movie would be considering that the book is 734 pages and the movie was less than 2.5 hours. But I have to admit in comparison to other the movies, this one is probably the best. There were practically no slow scenes. It stayed packed with action and humor the entire time and remained as true to the book as it could considering the time restriction. I particularly enjoyed when the Durmstrang boys arrived at Hogwarts. It was like a cross between some sort of African tribal dance and a Greek step show...very well done. Oh yeah, if anyone else has watch the movie, do the Death Eaters look similar to the KKK to you? Just wondering....
Disappointed
posted on 10 Aug 2009I was disappointed by the movie. I think that Warner Brother should have invested a little more time, money and efforts. Special effects were poor to say the least. The actor playing Dumbledor is not well suited for the role or badly directed. Professor Moody's makeup and costume makes him look kind of cheap. The castle's design was really impressive in the 3 first movies; in this one it looks dull. The arrival of the chariot and boat of the other schools is really not impressive. Important scenes are missing, for example, it would have been really enjoyable to see each participant's fight against the dragons. With a better script and high quality special effects, Harry's fight against the dragon could have been a really great scene. I left the theater thinking Warner Brother wanted a maximum profit with minimal investment.
Awesome Movie, director has done a good job ....
posted on 30 Aug 2009Well, I am not a Harry Potter fan, I never read the books and it never bothers me, but as my friends took me to this movie, I immediately fell for this. I recognized a very deep character change / alter, which is totally new in the Potter movies (I watched 1,2,3 directly afterwards). The characters grew up and mutate into young sentimentally people with many adventures and creatures and particularly magic. What can I say, it's truly the best Harry Potter movie ever, and I hope the next will get even better, what I really doubt. It's kinda weird, but I think it couldn't be done any better, so i recommend it for everyone - young and old.10/10