Hulk Movie
| Resolution | Size | Download | ||
|
1920x1040 | 8141.14 MiB | 1080p | |
|
1280x720 | 4172.26 MiB | 720p | |
|
720x376 | 1730.43 MiB | hidivx | |
|
592x308 | 869.21 MiB | divx | |
|
320x168 | 343.49 MiB | hpc | |
Storyline
TAGLINES
The inner beast will be released
Rage. Power. Freedom.
On June 20th Let it All Out
Unleash the hero within
After a terrible accident of Bruce banner in the lab his extraordinary mind is now making him angry.He then figures out that David banner is his real father.Bruce has now turned into hulk and nothing can stop him for when he is angry.Betty is the only person that can stop him from being angry.Betty has now gone to the father to ask for help how to help him,but the father has now sent his super villian dogs like hulk to kill her,hulk is now the only person to stop the mutant dogs.David banner has now transformed himself into anything he touches and with evil power,hulk must now save the world and save the people.
| Nick Nolte | Father |
| Paul Kersey | Young David Banner |
| Jennifer Connelly | Betty Ross |
| Josh Lucas | Talbot |
| Eric Bana | Bruce Banner |
| Sam Elliott | Ross |
| Cara Buono | Edith Banner |
| Todd Tesen | Young Ross |
| Kevin O. Rankin | Harper |
| Celia Weston | Mrs. Krensler |
| Mike Erwin | Teenage Bruce Banner |
| Craig Damon | Security Guard |
| Ang Lee |
5.90 out of 10 (34786 votes)
Visitor Reviews
HULK SMASH! (and man, does he smash well!)
posted on 26 Aug 2009Okay, this movie had a few holes in the plot, and there were some things I would've changed about the story, including choice of main villain. And Ang Lee used the comic-book-page transition effect a little too much.That said, I came to see the Hulk in action, and MAN! Was I pleased! Yeah, he looked CG, but you know what? I didn't care! His mannerisms, his strength and power, his innocence... These were things the movie got perfect to a T! When the Hulk fought, the audience (myself included) cheered out loud. And with good reason! Here was the green giant himself, brought to life to the true extent of his power and being for the first time ever. Lou Ferigno had a fairly good as a powered-down made-for-TV Hulk, but this is a role that no "puny human" can truly play. The Hulk movie brought one of my favorite comicbook characters to life, and for that I give this movie two big green thumbs up!
awful movie
posted on 24 Aug 2009the incredible hulk in my youth was my favourite superhero, so i was looking forward to this film hugely - oh dear what a disappointment it was! getting an arty director to make an action movie was just too much for him. the result was a complete mess, which is a shame because i thought eric bana was really good under the circumstances. jennifer connely is a talented actress but was a bit wasted in this film, Nick Nolte was severely miscast and his character still has myself scratching my had as to what was going on. in fact most people you speak to, will say that the ending is the worst (or best if you get my meaning!) thing about the film.stick to art-house films ang lee! hulk 2 will be an improvement - i guarantee it!
Worst Movie In History
posted on 24 Aug 2009My title speaks for itself. In no way what so ever was this screenplay smart, or clever. The cinematography and special effects are amateur at best, and the acting was horrendous. The great director Ang Lee might have ruined any chance he has of directing another potentially great superhero film. 1/10 I would have given it 0 but I'm a nice guy, and i have to admit, there was only one part of the movie i liked, and if you are an extreme movie goer like me, you will know which part."That is one tasty burger! you ever been to that big kahuna burger Vince? well, they make a pretty good f**kin burger."-Pulp Fiction (Uncut Edition) -
Awful
posted on 22 Aug 2009That's basically all I can think of to say... The Hulk was incredibly disappointing. Where Spiderman had plot, deep characters and a likeable protagonist, Hulk has bad SFX and no storyline at all, and the "good guy?" I saw nothing but an irritating growling chunk of greenness. It's as if the script-writers all sat down to have a meeting and said "Ok, we have a giant green man. What should happen? Anything goes, guys, we have two hours to fill." I think the only people who will like this movie are the die-hard Hulk comics readers, and possibly Special-Effects junkies. If you're looking for plot, real characters, or even a remotely entertaining film, chances are, you won't find it here.Oh yeah, and what on earth was up with the opening credits? Chopping up a starfish, gassing monkeys, exploding frogs... my word, whose idea was that?
I would say don't bring kids to this movie (WAY too scary) but if you do, DON'T let them watch the opening sequence.
Tired of Big-Budget Movies with No Substance.
posted on 20 Aug 2009I wanted my money back after seeing this one. I'm tired of all these
movies derived from video games and comic strips. They lack plot and enjoyment. The Hulk is a gargantuan bunch of special effects (true, which are wonderful to gaze at), but they're wrapped around a story that has no enjoyable story l
Disappointing screen treatment of the Marvel comic-book favourite – it never seems to decide what approach to take or who its target audience should be.
posted on 20 Aug 2009It would be wrong to call "Hulk" a super-hero movie. By definition, super-heroes have extraordinary powers…. but they usually put them to good use, e.g. hunting criminals or saving the world. The Hulk is actually a monster, a threat to mankind, so strictly speaking this version of "Hulk" is actually a monster movie, more akin to the likes of "King Kong" and "Godzilla". Director Ang Lee is a very versatile film-maker – his oeuvre includes period costumer "Sense And Sensibility", family drama "The Ice Storm", western epic "Ride With The Devil" and martial arts opus "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon". But he comes unstuck with this attempted comic book adaptation because his intelligent style is too ambitious for the genre. Ultimately, "Hulk" lacks the gung-ho energy craved by the popcorn generation, but also fails to pursue its artistically complex theme of identity and "the inner demon" to its logical conclusion. The result is a film which falls into no man's land – those looking for a more mature, thoughtful approach will hate the action-packed second half, while those looking for outrageous action and destructive set pieces will hate the heavy-going first half.Dr David Banner (Paul Kersey) works on a remote desert nuclear base and is trying to find a way of regenerating deteriorating human bodies. Part of his research involves experimenting upon himself. When his wife gives birth to a baby boy named Bruce, David is interested to find out if any of his genetic changes have been inherited by the child. But his observations are cut short when his research programme is terminated – in a fit of rage, he sets off a deliberate explosion at the base and ends up killing his wife during an argument shortly afterwards. Young Bruce grows up in an adopted family, never knowing what happened to his birth parents nor that he may be carrying abnormal genes as a result of his father's work. Many years later, grown up Bruce (Eric Bana) is working at a scientific institution when he accidentally gets zapped by a powerful gamma ray. Rather than killing him as it should, the gamma ray merely unlocks the abnormalities inside him. His real father (Nick Nolte, as the older Dr David) turns up and hints at the freakish powers Bruce possesses. Sure enough, a while later Bruce gets angry about something and finds himself turning into a gigantic green monster with incredible strength and agility. When Bruce's work colleague and ex-girlfriend, Betty Ross (Jennifer Connelly), discovers that he has this fierce alter ego she is desperate to help him. But the military are keen to capture Bruce whilst he is in his hulk state so that they can take samples from him for research purposes. This only makes him angrier than ever, whereupon he escapes the research laboratory and goes on a destructive rampage.By far the best thing that Lee has done in the film is his virtuoso use of split screen imagery. There are times when the screen actually resembles a page in a comic book, with picture boxes all over the place showing different angles, points of views and character reactions. It is a fascinating technique, skilfully used. But in most other aspects "Hulk" is a disappointing film. Only Nolte seems to create the correct acting style for the kind of film he's in – Bana is too moody, Connelly too serious, and Sam Elliott comes across as a stereotypical caricature as an army general. The special effects are less impressive than expected. Yes, the destruction of streets and vehicles is convincing enough during the San Francisco sequence – but the Hulk itself is a horribly fake-looking creature, more reminiscent of Shrek than the comic creation of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. Considering Lee's reputation and the rich cinematic potential of the original comic books, "Hulk" emerges as rather a let-down.
Worst film I have ever seen, ever.
posted on 20 Aug 2009Adding to previous comments, this isn't just the worst Marvel movie ever made, this is without a shadow of a doubt, the worst MOVIE ever made. This is because of one simple fact, the movie is just SO damn boring! After the film ended I was left with a feeling of sadness at the loss of the last two and a half hours of my life, sigh. I saw Peter Jackson's attempt at making a horror movie in 'Bad Taste' when I was thirteen and I thought that was bad, Hulk now makes it seem worthy of an Oscar! I recommend that everyone steers well clear of this movie, there are a million better things you could be doing with your time, anything at all, even watching paint dry. Seriously.
I'm not angry...just disappointed !
posted on 18 Aug 2009Hmmm...how should i start ? Well, I was really looking forward to watch this movie...even after a few of my friends told me i'd better save a couple of bucks rather than spend it to watch this movie...but still...i thought this movie is going to be nice ! Boy...i was wrong... the first part of the movie was particularly boring...i didn't know what Ang Lee is trying to do...maybe he's going for oscar again with this movie ! but it's for us to enjoy...something like popcorn movie...spiderman...x-men...but then, it has to be this boring...i'm not a movie critic whatsoever but just normal moviegoer who hopes for pure entertainment...save for a few interesting scenes especially at the desert, other than that this movie is a total disappointment. I don't know what other people is trying to say about the father-son relationship...etc...but in simple words, the HULK is not entertaining at all !!! So if there's gonna be a sequel, i just hope that someone take note of the flaws of this film and make it better...and lets not talk about the CGI...i've heard a lot on the fake CGI so i was prepared when i went to watch the movie...my expectation was really very very low...so I didn't bother so much about the CGI...just kept telling myself...oh...i knew about that...so a boring movie with bad CGI...you decide yourself... **1/2 out of 5.
Slow and boring with terrible direction, writing and acting.
posted on 18 Aug 2009One point (pointless is closer to the truth). The simple origin story in the comic book is replaced by a long and very dull
family psycho-drama dating back 30 years. It's a good 40 minutes (actually it is a
very bad 40 minutes) before we get to see The Hulk, and even then the action
scenes are no fun at all. The standard of the dialog in this movie is very low. It plays like Ang Lee wrote
the script in Chinese and then got Google to translate it into English. The direction is appalling.
Ang makes heavy handed use of split screen in an overly literal attempt toevoke the feeling of comic book panels. What Ang should instead havepreserved was the fast pace and simplistic story lines of the original. This film
desperately needs comic relief - lots of it. It takes itself so seriously you'd think
this was Schindler's List, not an attempt at a Summer action movie.
one of the most boring films
posted on 18 Aug 2009this film was one of the most boring film ever. scenes were too long and most of them were unnecessary. for example the scene when the hulk kept on jumping. what was that about? was there any reason for it? if it was to show his struggle or something it wasn't effective because i was soooo bored.and hulk is a comic book hero so it's supposed to be action right.i don't know what this film was trying to do but it totally failed to amuse or entertain. i'm wondering how it could have earned this much money.
Could have been so much better, even with the CGI hulk!
posted on 16 Aug 2009The Hulk is one of MARVEL'S greatest creations and because of my height (7ft), I always felt I had something in common with the big green guy. Seeing this film was high on my to do list of 2003, but upon leaving the cinema I felt a little let down. Spider-man was an excellent movie, and it was obviously going to be an effort for "HULK" to live up to the same level of hype as his web-head buddy.My main problem with the film's the origin story, it's been changed so many times that it's starting to become silly (eg. Banner's father injecting him with gamma irradiated chemicals as a toddler) surely they could have come up with something more original and less a clear case of child abuse!!!I personally found the CGI hulk to work quite well and to those who didn't, I say it really was the only logical step in his evolution. Not too sure about the fluctuations in height though, sort it out in the sequel please (because you wouldn't like me when I'm angry)!!!
Unlike any other comic-book film
posted on 16 Aug 2009I watched this on an airplane ride. Loved it. Didn't have high expectations because of the mixed reviews. Then realized that reviews are always to be taken with a grain of salt. Unlike other comic book films that almost always appear cartoon-ish, this film was far more introspective. Relative to the length of the film, the minimal amount of screen time spent on showcasing the actual Hulk was actually quite refreshing. I found the emphasis on why the Hulk is who he is, and how he got there, to be a successful attempt by Lee to humanize him.And Bana played the tormented Banner awfully well. I hope to see more of him in the future.I give this film 7 out of 10.
I shudder at the perfection.
posted on 14 Aug 2009When I had heard about the famed "HULK" returning to the silver-screen I had my doubts, because MARVEL had a good run with the movies it had released earlier in the year, and the year before. So, I had assumed that HULK would be the downfall. I never had a real respect for the HULK because, it sounded like a dull idea to me, but I promised myself I would never judge a movie without doing my homework. So I went and read the comics. Incredible, is all I can say. HULK was perpetuated, with the exception of a few events, so wonderfully that I could do nothing but look at the screen and clap blindly. The movie was fluid, one event leading into the next, no jumping, or plot gaps. Everything is given to you, then all you have to do is sit back and enjoy. Instead of basing a movie solely on it's FX, or Acting, HULK brought both aspects expertly to the screen. I can safely say, that this is by far my favorite MARVEL movie to date. Ang Lee has really outdone his-self this time and I hope his movies will be equally good in the future. I guarantee that anyone, from the hardcore comic book reader to the average action seeker, will thoroughly enjoy this film. And hopefully, they will gain from it the same satisfaction that I have. HULK does not let down. Any nay-say for this movie would most likely come from someone that hates action movies completely, and/or bases these movies entirely on the comics that precede them.5/5 Stars.
A modern day Greek Tragedy
posted on 14 Aug 2009First of all let me congratulate Ang Lee on a job well done. The Hulk, like any other comic book movie, is for the fans of the character above anything else. Having said that, I believe that some who may have never even heard of the character may like the movie because of the way Ang Lee has handled the subject matter. Ang Lee is to The HULK as Sam Raimi was to Spider-Man.When I first heard the movie was coming out I was really excited but then I saw the Super Bowl trailer..and like many, was skeptical. More than anything else I was interested in the CGI aspect of the film. I'll admit that there are a few places where the CGI could have used a little work but what LITTLE CGI couldn't accomplish the story and the direction more than made up for it, so I wasn't dissapointed.The cast is okay, especially Nick Nolte as a deranged scientist brought life to his character. The turbulent relation ship between the father and son is the main plot of the film, not the fact that Dr. Bruce Banner becomes the HULK.The CGI wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. In fact some of the facial expression on the CGI HULK were so real that I (and many of my friends) could identify with the character...and he wasn't even real!!! The part when the HULK stands in front of Bruce's house on the military base..the expression on his face ...hats off to ILM!!!!The HULK is not without it's flaws.. the movie is too long and a lot of time is taken up in setting the background and introducing the characters. Like many people, I feel that the HULK at times didn't seem real enough. There were many points in the movie where his motions were jerky.Overall, this is an enjoyable film..but not a breakthrough film. I wouldn't mind seeing a sequel(s) to this film and hopefully ILM will have learnt from its mistakes.
A Hulking Disaster
posted on 12 Aug 2009Hulk is based off of the popular hero. The film has very nice CGI effects and voice works, but that is not enough to save it from the poor, underwhelming story and the runtime and dragging of the movie.This is one of my least favorite movies ever made, I am so not happy about how this turned out. I was expecting action every minute. I only got about 25 minutes of action 2 hours of nothing.I considered walking out when it was out and going in the theater playing Finding Nemo. Hulk is definitely not the best summer 2003 movie. I was disappointed.There were some scenes that were great including the helicopter chase and the scene with the three dogs attacking the woman. Overall, it dragged too much and there was nothing in it for me to really remember.I think Marvel should pay close attention to the studios making the films based on their franchises.
Finally a movie that keeps the feel of the original
posted on 10 Aug 2009I wasn't sure how I would like the "CG" HULK before I went to the opening today. I have to say that, having seen it, it was great. Using the CG Hulk helps this movie keep the feel of the original "Incredible Hulk."If you like the original Hulk comics, you should like this movie. It even has a comic book look and feel to it during certain scenes. (you'll have to see the movie)All in all, I really enjoyed this movie. Just one nagging thought that has been on my mind for years....what's the deal with the pants??? Don't think about it too much...just enjoy the movie!
A missed opportunity
posted on 10 Aug 2009My impression of Hulk can best be summed up in two words: missed opportunity. This was a chance to tell the origin story of one of Marvel's most popular comic book characters, but instead we get a very talky and slow film about the estrangment of children from their parents. This film is no Spider-Man or X-Men (or X2 for that matter). It doesn't try to be, and I think therein lies the problem. When I heard Ang Lee was directing Hulk, I thought it was a strange choice. Lee was the director of the excellent Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and probably the seminal period-piece chick-flick of all time, Sense and Sensibility. But because it was such an odd choice, I thought it could be something exciting and different. The result, in my opinion, was definitely different, but by no means exciting. The massive amounts of promotional ads and trailers for the film show us a glimpse of the movie that Hulk should've been -- scenes of the Hulk facing off against the military, the Hulk battling mutant dogs, and the Hulk pounding through the big city. And to be fair, we do get those scenes in this film and they are quite good. The problem lies between these action sequences, where we get scene after scene of tedious and sometimes silly exposition with actors who really don't seem to be interested. I found nothing special about Eric Bana, the actor who portrays Bruce Banner. He stares blankly through most of the picture, only emoting just before his transformation scenes. Jennifer Connelly seems equally bored, and shares little chemistry with Bana, her love interest in the movie. Josh Lucas plays Talbot, a limp and ineffective villain who is about as threatening as an accountant. Veterans Sam Elliot and Nick Nolte overact their way through most of their scenes, adding some spice to an otherwise boring cast. My favorite part of this movie suprised me: it was the Hulk himself. What I had seen of the Hulk in the promotional materials hadn't really impressed me much. I thought the Hulk looked pretty fake, but I hoped he would work in the context of the movie. Fortunately he does. The only time the film comes alive is when the Hulk is smashing his way through one situation or another. He looks more realistic in closeups than the long shots though. In this era of excellent CG creations like Yoda and Gollum, it seems like the Hulk is a step backwards, but his presence in this otherwise stale film is most welcome. The reason this movie will fail at the box office is because it's just no fun. I can't imagine the target audience of this movie lining up multiple times to see Nick Notle and Eric Bana discuss Bruce Banner's troubled childhood in endless scenes. Ang Lee set out to make a "serious" film about a subject which demands you cannot be too serious. The result is a failure. However, the one scene that is pitch-perfect is the last scene in the film. It actually put a big smile on my face just before the lights came up, and made me forget briefly that I hadn't enjoyed myself for the past 2 1/2 hours. It had that fun magic that the rest of the film lacked. If there is a sequel, I hope whoever is at the helm can capture that spark and make a Hulk movie people will actually want to see again. My Grade: D+
Sad effort,bad story..Nothing like it should have been!!
posted on 30 Aug 2009Just finally got round to watching this last night and was so disappointed to see how much of a flop it was..Eric Bana should have known better as soon as he saw the script..The hulk was portrayed as the "bad guy" way too much and that "split scene" filming was awful..After "Iron Man" was so good.. Even the effects were unreal and "fake" compared with the other Super hero movies.Compare this with any of the x-men movies and you will be horrified...The Hulk charicture was bad enough but...the dogs??...Aw please...Sadly I thought I would try this being a newer movie..But I think I would go back to Bill Bixby and Lou Farregno. It was way better!!!