Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom Movie
| Resolution | Size | Download | ||
|
1280x544 | 4464.57 MiB | 720p | |
|
720x296 | 1972.96 MiB | hidivx | |
|
592x244 | 583.26 MiB | divx | |
|
304x124 | 252.05 MiB | hpc | |
Storyline
TAGLINES
If adventure has a name... it must be Indiana Jones.
The hero is back!
Trust him.
The man in the hat is back...
Renowned archeologist and expert in the occult, Dr. Indiana Jones, is back in action in the 2nd Indy film. He teams up with a night club singer and a 12 year old named Short Round. They end up in an Indian village, where the people believe evil spirits have taken their children away after a sacred stone was stolen. Indiana agrees to try and retrieve the stone for the villagers.
| Kate Capshaw | Wilhelmina 'Willie' Scott |
| Amrish Puri | Mola Ram |
| Roshan Seth | Chattar Lal |
| Philip Stone | Captain Blumburtt |
| Chua Kahjoo | Chen |
| Harrison Ford | Indiana Jones |
| Jonathan Ke Quan | Short Round |
| Roy Chiao | Lao Che |
| David Yip | Wu Han |
| Rick Young | Kao Kan |
| Rex Ngui | Maitre d' |
| Philip Tan | Chief Henchman |
| Dan Aykroyd | Earl Weber |
| Dr. Akio Mitamura | Chinese Pilot |
| Michael Yama | Chinese Co-Pilot |
7.30 out of 10 (54238 votes)
Visitor Reviews
Incompetent, but hugely enjoyable
posted on 06 Aug 2009Spielberg vs. Lucas - Lucas wins every time. There's no plot, just a story (see EM Forster - and then .. and then). To engage your audience with this kind of comic-book style, you have to grab them from the outset, and keep hold. Spielberg blows it from frame one with his rather feeble Busby Berkeley pastiche, which sets up a totally wrong set of expectations. This wouldn't matter if what followed had been more efficiently done. Instead, I am forced to notice continuity errors (where did they get their clothes?), longueurs where there should be acceleration, racing action where I could have done with a bit of a slow-down just to catch up ... Having said all that, the movie gripped me to the end. Amongst all the late 20th century directors, Spielberg is the best at doing this. Even at his worst (which this isn't, quite), his visual sense is still unsurpassed. Maybe he needs to finally shed the baleful Lucas influence?
Fortune and Glory
posted on 31 Jul 2009This was my favorite movie when I was younger. Indy is my perfect man and this movie is fabulous. What could be cooler than riding down a snow-covered mountain in a life-raft and then falling into a river and landing in a cute little town in India and saving everyone!?! Plus, the eyeball soup is classic.
"INDY-SCRIBABLE!"
posted on 28 Jul 2009With respect to each and every honest opinion about this disrespectfully dumped-on, yet highly successful blockbuster, it seems that many people out there still judge a motion picture for its kind and not for how it serves that kind. They say this second INDIANA JONES (which was my first, by the way) was dark, gross, violent, or whatever. Well, people, since I dont see anybody judging this adventure artistically, let's not forget that movies are art. They can take more forms than we know, and all they require is our appreciation. Yeah ok, so there are things you cant help but feel uncomfortable with or see as plain stupid, but I'm sure you can surpass that by taking them from a different point of view… at least to feel the joy it brings to others, right? After all, a movie can only make sense if it entertains or interests you, but unfortunately, the simple truth is that many moviegoers are too proud of themselves as discriminating little suckers who think they've seen it all. Suit yourself.I only ramble about this subject because of what I've learned from this very particular movie : beauty is where it's perceived, whether you're young or old; it's just a matter of how much you appreciate it. I saw INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM when I was somewhere between 7 and 8 years old, and even though I can now understand very clearly why it would seem weaker than RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK to most people, I could never call it either better or worse, because of the most passionate memory I have of it.As a wild n' wonder-filled little boy, I fell madly in love with the very first glimpse I caught of it in a preview on TV when two really cool-looking Indian swashbucklers came face to face with this new, fairly muscular hero with a cowboy hat, bullwhip hanging to his belt, dirty white shirt with a fully torn right sleeve, and a scarred unshaved face that greeted them with a one-of-a-kind killer smile. Beautiful! Just beautiful! And with the wild jungles in the morning background, it hit even harder!When I went to see it at a theater with my family, even with my highest expectations, I could never describe how overpowered I became by every single ingredient of this roller-coaster ride from hell. Here's a few: awesome hero, awesome villains, colorful visual dynamics, creepy nightmarish feel, high-spirited sense of humor,`heart-ripping' violence, stunt-filled action, brutal voodoo magic, John Williams' sensational score, not to mention the delicious adventurous flavor of India ( which was a huge part of the magic ) and, of course, those totally disgusting gags that made me laugh like crazy. ( Hey, when you're a 7.5 year-old male watching a fat guy let out a monster belch after sucking the insides of a king-size bug, it'll pretty much make your day too. Heh, heh)I must admit that I've never been totally swept away by my moments with a movie as much as I'd been with this one, and I hope to relive them someday by trying harder to understand and appreciate the art of movies… instead of simply making comments like film critic Leonard Maltin who called my NO#1 favorite movie `headache-inducing'.Well look who's talking.
True Adventure
posted on 28 Jul 2009Karen Allen in the first film was the tomboy cum strongwilled woman whom Indy fell for years before. Allison Doody in the third film was the treacherous nazi femme fatale with divided loyalties. Kate Capshaw in "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" is the ultimate damsel in distress, the pampered and shallow showgirl who is thrust into a world far away from
the material comforts she enjoys as an exiled American Singer in 1930's Shanghai. From the opening Busby Berkeley-like production number (brilliant in its glittering tribute to
Ginger Rogers/Ruby Keeler pictures of the mid thirties) it is obvious her character is going to be the screaming mimi designed to get on the audiences as well as Indy's nerves. People miss the point that every nuance of her performance is intentional and not a result of any bad acting on the behalf of Miss Capshaw. That all said, this is easily the best installment of The Indiana Jones Trilogy, the only one that attempts pure 1930's adventure with elements from a host of 1930's films set in exotic locales and borrowing its plot mostly from the greatest adventure film ever made, 1939's "Gunga Din". The dark and mystical nature of this film's story makes it a welcome change from the other two film's heavy biblical quests. "Raiders of the Lost Ark" was original and magnificent in that regard but a return to that territory in "Last Crusade" left the filmmakers reaching. For the pure Indiana Jones experience it is "Temple of Doom" all the way.
Best of the Series
posted on 22 Jul 2009Second of the Indy series is the best. Taking place before the original. Indy, a nightclub singer, and a small japanese pickpocket go to India where they must save a village from Thuggee cultists. Not for everyone, with an successful attempt to overdo everything that made Raiders of the Lost Ark great. More violence, gore, grossouts, and traps. Definately the darkest of the series and not for kids.**** out of **** stars.
Spielberg/Lucas' guide to sheer cliffhanging, shamefully entertaining adventure-lore
posted on 01 Jul 2009There's a part of me that wonders why I might have a rating as listed here as an 8/10 for Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, an 1980's blockbuster thrill-ride that many 'Jones' fans list as their least favorite- at the least inferior to Raiders- in the series so far. But then I have to take into account that for a film of this kind, one that poses the no-holds barred case of eleven-year old minds caught up in a grown-up control, it's quite spectacular in its manic, throw-in-the-sink kind of action film that more than pays homage to the matinée serials of the past. Since the last time I saw the film the bulk faded away from a random childhood day, seeing it today I'm struck by how it does tap into that sense of humor that is unhinged. This is more than just a vehicle for Harrison Ford, it's a crash course in delirious escapism, of things that make your skin crawl, thrills pushing a relentless arena, and dark comedy.This time, in a way, Spielberg, Lucas, and the American Graffiti co-writers (hence a bit of a push from Raiders on the bits of comedy), they set themselves up to make what happens so outrageous and (in its classically conventional way) manipulative. The story takes place in 1935, a year before Raiders in 1936, but the links of the story lines aren't important like in the Star Wars movies. It's simply sets a precedent for the filmmakers- the audience knows he'll get out of whatever's dished out, almost as a kind of toughening up for future tales of Dr. Jones. On the one hand the film delivers with a lot of promise on just the terms of pure spectacle (the brilliantly over the top opening Shanghai sequence, the whole main temple arena with its satanic overtones, the cart chase) and in pulling laughs out of the supporting characters here and there (Kate Capshaw will hit or miss with people, though Short round is quite the amusing- and not annoying- side character).On the other hand, however, there is a lack of real classic movie cliché thrills of Raiders, or with the movie star repore of Ford and Connery in Crusade. And, in truth, everything here is so completely immersed in the B-movie ideal of f***ing with you at every turn, even as a PG movie of the time, it very often pushes on the line of being hokey. The song that starts the film, Anything Goes, should give anyone an idea of what to expect from Spielberg and Lucas, two thirty-something men who in Temple of Doom- for better or worse- tap truthfully into their inner immature selves. It may miss the mark of greatness, but it's still one of the real guilty pleasures of the 1980's.
My least favourite Indiana film in the trilogy
posted on 25 Jun 2009'Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom' stars Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones who teams up with a kid named Shorty and a very feminine dancer to sort out some problem with an underground cult of human sacrificers who are reaping trouble upon a small rural community. This is my personal least favourite of the Indiana Jones films. I found much less substance to it, and I found the characters and the idea of the cult to be very silly. It is difficult to take this film seriously. It's still got some action, but it's probably best appreciated by children than the other two films. I say it's a stinker, despite some of the action scenes, and it's best avoided unless you're not an adult. I will say I appreciated it slightly more as a child, but the other two films ('Lost Ark' and 'Last Crusade') are much better films, in my personal opinion.
The best of the series.
posted on 29 May 2009Believe it or not, "Temple of Doom" was actually my favorite Indiana Jones movie; "Raiders of the Lost Ark" would be next. The movie had several flaws, but all movies do, even the Star Wars series. The reasons I like this movie are: 1) We have a new enemy other than the Nazis; a Hindu cult believed to have been wiped out, who worship the vampire goddess Kali. 2)This movie was non-stop action, unlike the other two, which moved by too slowly. 3)The dinner scene, while disgusting, was hilarious, especially when Willie looked into her bowl of soup and saw...well, I can't spoil it for the people who haven't seen it yet. 4)The mine cart chase was the best part of the movie. 5)The music was excellent. John Williams is the best. Now, for the bad parts of the movie. 1)First of all, the title sounds cheesy. "Temple of Doom?" Spielberg could've come up with something more imaginitive. 2)The first time I saw the part when Mola Ram ripped out that guy's heart, I was shocked. Now, though, it looks fake. Mola Ram's hand moved way too fast when he plunged it through the victim's chest. 3)The maharajah was a wuss and shouldn't have been in the movie in the first (at first, I thought he was a girl!) 4)Willie screamed TOO MUCH; it was funny the first couple of times, but it started to annoy me after the plane crash. All in all, this movie is very good. I hear that a fourth Indy movie is coming out, and it may be about Atlantis. As long as it has Harrison Ford, I'll watch it!
Anything Goes & This Goes To Normal Jones Fare
posted on 20 May 2009While the action sequences in this movie seem more frantic than the Raiders of The Lost Ark or The Last Crusade, the domination of them is to cover a weakness in not only the script but the heroine. Kate Capshaw does not thrill me in this role here. I think she is the weakest actress in the series. Unfortunately, she is the most dominate woman in any of the films appearing more than any other which sinks this film to ordinary.Harrison Ford is pretty much his usual Indiana. A lot of the scenes were shot inside a massive cave complex which detracts from the film as well. This turns out to be Spielbergs bridge from the first to third film much like The Empire Strikes Back was for George Lucas in the Star Wars series. While your heroes are here & there is plenty of action, it leaves you a little flat from the first film.Out of the films in this series, this one is by far the weakest.
The Weakest Indy, But Still A Treat
posted on 23 Apr 2009When the original is one of the best movies of all time, how exactly do you make a sequel? Spielberg solved this tricky problem in 1984 by making his sequel to Raiders Of The Lost Ark darker, scarier, and more violent than the amazing original. Rather than the fun, serial style of Raiders, Spielberg opts instead for a dark, more horror-influenced film that actually takes place before its predecessor. Harrison Ford once again puts on the dusty old hat for his signature role as Indiana Jones. This time he finds himself in India, when a poor but deeply religious town asks him to track down a missing stone that, according to legend, will bring prosperity back to their community. Adding to the urgency is the fact that all of the small local children have mysteriously disappeared. Joining Indy this time is a pluckish young boy and a whiny damsel-in-distress type. Kate Capshaw brings a good sense of humor to the movie, but unfortunately she could never match Indy's original female sidekick, the brave and intimidating Marion. Indy's advisaries look equally menacing, however. Filling in the Nazi's shoes this time around is an Ancient murderous cult steeped in live human sacrifices. Can Indy defeat the cult and capture the stone? Of course he can, he's an action hero. It's the getting there that's the fun, and in it's final act, this movie offers up enough of it to almost match the first.Unfortunately, it's the shaky start that sets this film several notches below Raiders Of The Lost Ark. Even so, it's an above average film from the action genre, and a must-see for all fans. It's a satisfying movie, even though at the end, you may find yourself wondering, "Didn't Indy have a class to teach or something?"(***/****)
Funny Indy Adventure
posted on 17 Apr 2009Indiana Jones is back in an adventure set before "Raiders of the Lost Ark" where he teams up with nightclub singer "Willie" Scott and twelve-year-old Short Round. They journey to an Indian village, where the people believe that evil spirits abducted their children after a sacred stone was stolen. In the mix is Mola Ram (Amrish Puri), who wants all the stones to great a superpower for him. So, Jones, Scott and Short Round must rescue the children and defeat the evils in one thrilling adventure that includes boobie-traps, mine-cart rides and evil magic. Kate Capshaw as Willie Scott was hilarious; the part where she got thrown off by an elephant and the part where she skirmishes at the food served in the Indian Castle were downright funny. Jonathan Ke Quan as Short Round gave a feisty and comical performance, yelling at Indy and Willie when danger is near. My favorite scene of him is when he punches the lights out of the young price. And, Harrison Ford as Indy gave us another action-packed, whip-cracking and dramatic performance. Great fun here. Not to be missed.So, don't be doomed and watch Temple of Doom.Grade A
A good Saturday afternoon flick
posted on 14 Apr 2009I am a huge Indiana Jones fan; I bet I've watched the three films at least a dozen times each. What makes me come back and be thrilled time and time again is the use of imagery, the quality of acting, the thrill of suspense, and the sparking of imagination.This prequel to Raiders of the Lost Ark is very similar to The Empire Strikes Back in its tone...they are dark, mysterious, and much more subtle than their counterparts. Doom is a good film, but not anywhere close to Empire or to the other films of the Indiana Jones trilogy. Why? Because it simply was too different from the original. I saw Indiana Jones in two different ways with two different films. Mainly, this is because he had a different female partner...two completely different characters as well. Even more importantly, he was fighting two different enemies, and as a result, it used two different "archeaologoical finds."It also lacked the story development that Raiders had. Raiders' power was its ability to constantly and convincingly bring action to the screen. This film lacked that style, and it hurt itself as a result.Honestly, I found this film too dark as well. Perhaps I'm expecting too much of a "good-feel" out of this film, but that is what this genre is all about, I think.Kate Capshaw did a decent job as Willie, but she at times was way too overdramatic. She was the exception rather than the rule, however. Harrison Ford gave his usual quiet, but awfully convincing performance. Ford's gift as an actor is to not over-emphasize. This film could let him get away with that, but he still chose not to. It made his performance so much better.There were other bright spots...the enemy was well-defined and was well-presented as ominous and completely convincing. In a good-vs.-evil genre, this film made it easy to distinguish between the two. The story itself was very easy to followThe special effects, which were somewhat unrealistic, still added rather than subtracted from the film. The music by John Williams was also excellent. The opening scenes were by far the best of the movie and very classic in style. This movie got your interest immediately. The most important thing: This film is complete entertainment. Not once did I feel bored.This film fulfills its basic function: to entertain, to thrill, and to provoke imagination. In this mode, it is a success. However, compared to the other two Jones films, this film is a bit of a disappointment. But it is guaranteed to be entertaining, and for that reason, I recommend it.7/10
weakest of the series
posted on 05 Apr 2009SPOILERSThe 1980's were a busy decade for Harrison Ford. From the second "Star Wars" film in 1980 through to the final "Indiana Jones" film in 1989, Ford was rarely away from the picture screen. This was not always a good thing however as this middle of the road second adventure about Dr Jones from 1984 proved.In "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom", we find Dr Jones in Shanghai in 1935. After a violent confrontation with a Chinese villain, Jones eventually finds himself in India. Taken to a small village, he encounters a badly treated people in need of help. To do this, Jones will have to travel to an ancient palace and combat the forces of evil.The key problem with this film is it's problems in the plot department. Whilst a fun film to doze off to on a Sunday afternoon, it is by a long distance the worst of the three "Indiana Jones" films. With a story involving an evil cult underneath an ancient palace, the story just doesn't have the special feeling which "Raiders of the Lost Ark" and "The Last Crusade" thrive on. Whether because of a considerable lack of Nazi's (this film actually being a prequel to "Raiders") or because Amrish Puri's Mola Ram just isn't that interesting a character, "Temple of Doom" simply feels lacking.At the same time, another problem with this film is the below par standard of acting. With characters like Short Round (Jonathan Ke Quan) and Willie Scott (future Mrs Spielberg, Kate Capshaw), we should never have expected much, but both performances are, to say the least, dreadful. Add to this some awful performances by the villagefolk who Indy is helping, and you know there's problems.It feels a shame that so much of this film is wrong, when the other two films of the trilogy are so good. With bad choices in plot and characters (Denholm Elliot's Marcus is a necessity for any Indiana Jones film), the story never really takes off and feels awkward. At just under two hours long, this film seems to drag and makes you feel like your watching all three parts of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. Still, for something to put on television and doze off to, it does work wonders. The question though is whether this is actually a good thing.
Good not great prequel.
posted on 06 Mar 2009If you are expecting this to be a sequel, you will be disappointed. This is a prequel to Raiders of the lost ark. Temple takes place in 1935. Raiders takes place in 1936. Well, I have review the first and fourth one. I might as well review all of them. This is my least favorite of the 4 movies, but that does not mean that it is bad. 1 thing I don't like about the movie is short round. But Short Round is better then Jar Jar. This is the movie that inspired the PG-13 rating. It is true. This film was controversial with parents because there is a scene where you can see a man's heart being ripped out. This film is known as the straw that broke the parents back. Steven Spielberg said whenever he saw a child in the movie theatre, He would cover his eyes when it showed the heart rip scene. Well, it is a good not great film. So I recommend it. My least favorite of the 4 movies, though. My overall rating is 7 out of 10 stars.
The sequel to the best Action series ever!
posted on 25 Feb 2009This is great film, I love all 3 Indy films. I love them equally I guess. But that great theme is back. Also, this is 1 of the 1st movies that made the MPAA make up that PG-13 rating. I will admit that Kate Capshaw's whining was dumb. I really cant compare all 3, they r excellent in their own way. Just seeing Indy turn bad 4 that sort time had me hoping that he would quickly be good again & kick some a$$. The bug scenes were gross since I hate those, I would literally just give up & die if that ever happen to me. That 'heart-ripping-out' scene was awesome. & I noticed Dan Aykroyd was in this film, but where? If u 4 whatever havent seen this film, then go & buy it NOW! 1 great sequel 2 an excellent original.
Simply put, an awesome film!
posted on 22 Feb 2009A lot may disagree, but Steven Spielberg did it again with this amazing sequel! One of the most enjoyable films from the 1980's, the good points outweigh the bad ones by a lot! Another terrific script structured by George Lucas, magnificent sets, a loud but thrilling score from John Williams, a fantastic fast pace and the good acting on the part of Harrison Ford make this sequel one that lives up to the original. Although it is not as good as Raiders of the Lost Ark, it's just as fun to watch. Some great stunts and visual effects also add to the excitement.Ignore the negative talk about this fantastic film and see for yourself how fun a movie can be!****1/2 /5
Lots of fun and refreshing.
posted on 19 Feb 2009i dont know why people think this movie is so bad. So, it has people of other races in this movie. Does that make this movie inferior to the other Indiana jones movies? Granted, the other two are fun and enjoyable, but the last crusade has got to be the cheesiest of the bunch. And both involved nazis. Boring. This one has juice in it. There is a sense that we, the audience, are actually on the same adventure with Indy, going from shanghai to india. This seems very modern, and gives us another dimension to indiana jones' character. He is a cultured person, who travels around the world. and he has friends all over the world. I think that is a great message to kids of all ages. Granted again, this is not as "adult" as the other indy adventures, but this one brings out the kid in all of us. Spielberg wanted to extend the courage and humanity of indiana jones to the children of the world. and I applaud spielberg and lucas for their love of mankind. And who doesnt like some comedy in an adventure movie? i think it makes the movie so much more enjoyable. Whenever i watch the movie, i never get the sense that it is an outdated movie. it always seem new to me. So, please people, open your mind for once.
Temple of Doom is MY favorite in the series!
posted on 10 Feb 2009Mild SpoilersIndiana Jones trilogy,from the masters George Lucas and Steven Spielberg comes a great action packed series of films that takes place in the early 1900s.Indiana Jones is really a hero,he goes from from country to country to find a special artifact and/or place and he usualy succeeds! This trilogy reminds ME alot of Star Wars. These are truly some of the best films ever.The Temple of Doom is MY favorite in the trilogy. I just love them jungles and the villan in this one.MY favorite part of Temple of Doom is the diner! Yummy! I just love the guy that say,Ah Desert! Temple of Doom spooky as well. This movie has action from beginning to end!
A great action flick
posted on 07 Feb 2009What can I say about the Indiana Jones movies? I love them all. This one is my favourite, simply because it was the first one I watched and it drew me in to the whole Indiana Jones story. The kid who played Shortround is absolutely amazing! So much better than some other child actors who can be annoying and fake. The movie combines action, humour and fast-paced escapes in a way that only an Indiana Jones film can. I might be a little biased, because I love Harrison Ford no matter what movie he's in, but I still think the criticism that this film has received is unfair, and altogether false! All in all, I highly recommend this movie, and give it ***** out of ***** stars.
Why i think people should watch this film
posted on 15 Aug 2009Indiana Jones I would definitely suggest that other people watch this film in fact I think that all other people should watch it. The story is great because it's filled with lots of sweet action. This movie also gives Harrison Ford, who is a great actor, a great character. But you might want to watch the other Indiana Jones movies first.I remember watching this movie when I was just a little kid and loving it I didn't really remember any of the story line or anything I just remember watching it and then last summer while I was fishing on my dads fishing boat we went to blockbusters and bought a bunch of used movies. One of the films that I chose was Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. I must have watched that movie over a dozen times last summer on the boat. And now I see why I liked it so much.The story in this movie is awesome Indiana Jones goes into an evil palace and has to steal back a sacred stone from a human sacrificing cult and free the children of the surrounding villages who have been kidnapped for manual labor. Its great it has all kinds of really cool parts in it. There are so many instances of good action in this movie it is hard to pick a few that give a good representation of just how great it is. One of my favorite parts of the movie was when Jones Shorty and Willy jump out of a crashing plane and use an inflatable life raft to cushion there fall and then sled down a mountain in it. Another part that I really liked was when the evil priest puts his hand in the slaves chest and rips his heart out that is awesome. The fight that he has with the huge slave driver down in the mines underneath the palace is great.I think that one reason that I like Harrison Ford so much is he has gotten in some great films like Apocalypse Now and American Graffiti but he has also had some pretty awesome roles to play when you think about it. I mean the guy played Han Solo in the star wars movies and Rick Deckard in Blade Runner. I think that is pretty good for any guy but he also plays Indiana Jones and I cant think of anyone that could do it better. Ford is perfect for it if you think about it Jones and Solo are pretty similar characters and Ford plays the adventurer He is pretty much a normal looking guy physically he might be a little bit more fit than the average guy but he is not some supper ripped Vin Diesel or The Rock type. So its cool you get the feeling that he's a real person but he is still a bad ass because he's smart and tough. Not tough like he can go pick guys up and throw them around but tough like he can take a lot of abuse.The only thing that I would say to someone if they asked me if they should watch it is that they should watch the other ones first. The movies stories do not depend on each other at all but the character of Indiana Jones is set up a lot more in The Search for the Holy Grail and somewhat in Raiders of the Last Arc. Temple of Doom sort of just jumps straight into the story where as The search for the holy grail does a really good job of setting up Indiana Jones by giving a excerpt from his child hood and showing how Indiana is driven by the same ideals and goals.This is probably one of my top ten favorite films of all time and everyone needs to have seen it.