Lost In Space Movie
| Resolution | Size | Download | ||
|
1280x544 | 5174.57 MiB | 720p | |
|
720x308 | 1492.13 MiB | hidivx | |
|
592x254 | 712.63 MiB | divx | |
|
320x136 | 289.03 MiB | hpc | |
Storyline
TAGLINES
Get Ready. Get Set. Get Lost.
Get Lost!
Danger Will Robinson!
An adventure like nothing on Earth
In the near future, earth's fossil resources are about to be used up. In an attempt to save the human race, scientists have begun building a gate, through which faster than light travel will be possible - but only if there is a gate at the destination to receive the travelers. The Robinson Family has been chosen to travel to Alpha Prime - the only other inhabitable planet known - at normal speed, ten years, cryogenically frozen. But Dr. Smith, a sinister man, sabotages their spaceship, Jupiter 2, but is also betrayed by his people. So, he has to work together with the Robinsons in order to survive himself. When Jupiter 2 is falling into the sun, the only chance to survive is to activate the hyperdrive - without a gate at the other end. Soon, the Robinsons are someplace really unknown, where they meet unfriendly silicon-based space spiders, take in a little ape-like creature and name new star systems after Bugs Bunny and Porky Pig. They have to reach Alpha Prime in order to build the second gate, or earth's only hope is gone.
| William Hurt | Prof. John Robinson |
| Mimi Rogers | Dr. Maureen Robinson |
| Lacey Chabert | Penny Robinson |
| Heather Graham | Dr. Judy Robinson |
| Jack Johnson | Will Robinson |
| Gary Oldman | Dr. Zachary Smith |
| Matt LeBlanc | Maj. Don West |
| Jared Harris | Older Will Robinson |
| Mark Goddard | General |
| Lennie James | Jeb Walker |
| Marta Kristen | Reporter #1 |
| June Lockhart | Principal Cartwright |
| Edward Fox | Businessman |
| Adam Sims | Lab Technician |
| Angela Cartwright | Reporter #2 |
| Stephen Hopkins |
4.70 out of 10 (16903 votes)
Visitor Reviews
Not bad
posted on 21 Aug 2009Matt Le Blanc really impressed me here. He is the first of the entire Friends cast to NOT play his regular character in a film. Aside from maybe Courtney Cox's Gail in Scream. Anyway, he did a damn fine job. He was sexy for the first time. Grrrrrrrrr... The film was ok. Great special effects of course. Mostly ******** but clean fun.
Script Lost In Hollywood Space. Warning, Minor spoilers.
posted on 15 Aug 2009This movie had it all. The budget, the actors, the special effects, the plot......oops well maybe not all. The movie is a great idea, but the plot makes no sense. The hyperdrive on Jupiter 2 can't be used unless exact coordinates to the destination are known. Why waste building space with a drive that cannot be used? (Unless you know you will get the coordinates later. Reading ahead in the script? hmm....) And if earth is only a few years from running out of resources, why send a gigantic ship full of hundreds of crew to look for 5 people? There are many other contradictions I won't go into. Suffice it to say it was a noble effort, but ultimately the only good thing to say about Lost in Space was it was better than the Avengers remake.
Crap
posted on 25 Jul 2009This movie is nothing but crap. The costumes look like something from "Power Rangers," the robot sounds drunk whenever it talks, awful acting and ridiculous special effects.I didn't want to see this movie but my Dad wanted to. He was begging me to go with him and I decided to give in. So one Sunday afternoon, we went to the movie. When the movie ended I had a blank expression on my face. This movie was a waste of my time but I'm glad I spent some time with my Dad.
I'll give it 4 stars!
posted on 10 Jul 2009This film has a pedigree of pure corn! It was just like the series, predictable and over the top -- which made it so enjoyable. I like sci-fi, but this was sci-com. It's about time science fiction stopped taking itself so seriously.Come on, get real folks at the end of the day this is pure escapism - don't try and make it out to be anything else.
Style with substance. ***1/2
posted on 10 Jul 2009Lost In Space is an exercise in inventive design and style. The look of the film is simply superb. The special-effects make the movie fun. Without being so seamless, it plays with them instead of showing them off like other movies. The characters were pretty interesting. Although Maureen Robinson (mom) and Penny (youngest daughter) are slightly under-used, I still felt the movie was fulfilling. The action sequences were great, inventive, and at times, original. If I had to pick my favorite part, I would say the whole movie was my favorite. The film flashed outstanding visuals, an interesting plot, and cheezy, yet effective special-effects. And the music by Bruce Broughton was outstanding. ***1/2 out of ****. 8 out of 10.
Pretty Good Movie
posted on 25 Jun 2009I liked this movie. A lot of people hate it because they just don't watch it with the right mentality. This is one of those movies which is a lot like, well, anything with Adam Sandler or Keanu Reeves. Turn your brain off. Don't think about what it is you're watching and just enjoy it. I liked this movie a lot, but then, I've never seen the original series.
From what I heard, that series was set in the way-distant year of 1997.
It does not compute
posted on 23 May 2009What if they made a movie version of the old TV show Lost in Space and the original robot, Jonathan Harris and Billy Mumy didn't show up? Danger Will Robinson is right. Those three were the show. At least the movie makers were wise enough to have the original voice in the new robot. That, June Lockhart's funny cameo plus the lift-off of the 'Jupiter 1' are the best parts of this billions budgeted bust. They could have saved millions by putting a man in the old robot suit instead of creating a real robot and it would have been an improvement! Instead of a CGI monkey (the absolute worst) they could have put big ears on a chimp ala the series and it would have been fine. But the biggest mistake was not giving Bill Mumy, the original Will Robinson, the role of the adult Will. That would have given old fans an emotional connection to what was a confusing,boring plot. And Dr. Smith becomes a spider? That is the final indignity! Oh the pain, the pain.
I love your masculine auburn hair ...
posted on 20 May 2009I saw this movie the same year it was released 1998. I was amused by the graphics, the beauty actor Matt Le Blanc, not an airhead, and his friends: Robots. Donna Haraway has an article entitled -A Manifest for Cyborgs- in which she explains the techniques of cyborg machines: They are robotic correctors who work on texts. Roland Barthes, the French theoric, wrote a book entitled -The Pleasure of the Text-, a masterpiece. His other books, the other books he wrote, are, among others: -Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes-, et cetera. My professor from the University of Michigan, Ross Chambers, is the mastermind, or popularly addressed as -HITLER'S HEAD- mostly because of his -Doctor-'s thesis published as a book with the title: -LA COM'EDIE AU CH^ATEAU- a study on 19th Century French Realist fiction, including Honor'e de Balzac, Gustave Flaubert, 'Emile Zola, Charles Baudelaire, Pascal: He is not in this movie, but his axis of realism, or perception, are present including in History: I recommend Theresa Brennan's -HISTORY AFTER LACAN-, an account of post-modern theories, Neo-Maoist, Anti-Marxist (because it does not believe in "techn'e", the Greek term, and it is, at the same time, a reader of J. Derrida and J. Lacan). -HISTORY AFTER LACAN- is an anti-foundational, as Hisotry always is, account of the mirror of this film: Into the future, yet always present. I loved it and much as I loved the actors, Matt Le Blanc et al. Where is the sex of the author? According to Michel Foucault, it is in the reader: According to Roland Barthes, it is in the death of the author at the hands of the "filigram" of sense. You will find the sex of this author, Matt Le Blanc, in this wonderful movie of magic and realism. An excellent "tour de force" for an acclaimed group of established actors, from the I. B. M. with red auburn love.
A fun sci-fi frolic!
posted on 11 May 2009If you leave your brain outside the cinema, and don't analyse it too closely , you will love Lost In Space. Its a visual and aural invasion, with
spectacular effects and a booming soundtrack. Of course the plot leaves a
little to be desired, as does the script, but hey, I laughed and oohed and
aahed all the way through. Sometimes I just want to be entertained without
thinking too much at the movies - Lost In Space fits the bill perfectly.
Oh, and Matt le Blanc is the first Friends star not to play that character
on the big screen. He's really macho, girls. Mmmm.
Cool sci-fi trip.
posted on 23 Apr 2009Very good special fx, not perfect, but very good and many of them! Nice story (could almost be called complex when you look at recent blockbuster movies). Suitable for the whole family. Some corny dialogues and one-liners though. And get ready to see all possible family problems packed in one motion picture, but hey - it's a refreshing change from all the monotonous sci-fi action/monster stuff of the last years. Kind of reminds me of 80s movies like Goonies. In my opinion worth a visit. Just grab a bag of popcorn and enjoy.
Well, I'm sure they tried
posted on 14 Apr 2009Well, you got to hand it to them: I mean, the people in this movie did the best they could. It's a shame that the plot was crap. In all honesty, you'd better really love the show Lost in Space to see this movie. Anyone else I don't think would like it much. I should know. Lets just say that this is the perfect example of why not to see a bad movie so you can see your favorite actor. I did. And I regret it. Believe me, you're better off seeing something else... although i'll have to admit, the special effects were pretty good, but flashy CGI can only get you so far....
Just one question...
posted on 02 Apr 2009When may we experience a sequel to this incredibly great movie???And to anyone complaining about it: I know your problem. You definetely didn't understand it at all. You didn't see that almost ALL of the dialogues were made up as jokes or quotes from other movies or TV series. And that the SFX were intended to look like they were made on a Amiga 500 to ridicule todays obvious need to stuff any movie with special effects. I propose that you watch it again and again to finally understand these facts.And, no, I didn't see any dubbed German version. I always prefer the original english language.10 out of 10, nothing less!
not soooo bad.
posted on 21 Mar 2009when this film came out in theatres, i went the opening night and thought that it was a real stinker. i still don't think it is a great flic, but i've seen it a few times on cable and find it passable mind-candy, as long as you don't think too hard about the gigantic holes in the plot or what this movie could have been with a better writer/director. the design work is above average and there are some rather ingenious set designs. would i rent it? nope. if it came on t.v., would i watch it? i might.
Read This Before Watching This Movie!!!!
posted on 15 Mar 2009Do not waste your time on this dreck.If you feel the urge to watch this movie, go mow the lawn, clean the garage, and if necessary, take your girlfriend to the opera. Any or all of those will be more rewarding, and far less painful. If you still feel the urge to watch it, lick your finger and stick it into a live socket. The deadly urge to watch Lost in Space must be defeated at all costs.I sacrificed two precious hours of my life on this cow-pie, finishing the movie only so I would have the credibility to warn others against making the same mistake. Please do not watch this movie, or my sacrifice will have been in vain.
Oh, the pain!
posted on 12 Mar 2009Every once in a while, there comes a movie I feel passionate about. This is one. I hated this movie with a passion!No kidding, this movie really ticked me off. Annoying actors portraying unappealing characters, insipid whining dialogue, special effects used to no good effect....I really think this movie didn't like me and wanted to inflict some pain on me. As I watched, I kept daydreaming about lining up the people who made this movie and b*tch slapping them one by one.*Sob!* I'm sorry, I can't go on! Just thinknig about this turd brings back traumatic memories.....I think I'll lie down for a while...
The all-shell M&M
posted on 25 Feb 2009Somehow, I knew this movie was going to be an excuse to sell happy meals.
I've seen some films that had a few "points of interest" tacked on, but this one was video-game quality special effects, and the rest was attached to the film on a 3M Post It and then glossed over with a shiny lacquer.The family sentiment and heartfelt emotion isn't built, but slapped onto this movie in the form of one liners. Little girls telling you not to love anything, because you'll only lose it... and then walking away. Does this sentiment play in the movie? Only for the time it takes her to say that line.Little boy explains friendship to robot in one scene. Hmm... how could this be more transparent?Action is done cool, with lines like "Pedal to the metal!" "Rock and Roll!" and my favorite: "I don't like the sound of that sound." But the thrill ride everyone seemed so excited about is nothing more than previews for the video game.The bright spot of this film was Gary Oldman. He hams it up as the whining doctor, but he is also menacing in ways the TV show never was. His innocent smile and reassurances (Yes. I'm a doctor.) are fantastic, and I have a feeling he enjoyed cartooning himself out for this role.But even if Oldman was an enjoyable cartoon, the movie was shallow. Ankle deep. It makes me remember when I thought Transformers was a wonderful show, and reading the positive reviews here, I smile on that naiveté... and remember my disappointment the first time I saw that show as an adult. It will be quite a shock when they rent Lost In Space for nostalgia's sake and find out what a hollow, soulless commercial it is.
Not too bad
posted on 19 Feb 2009Wasn't the best movie, but I quite enjoyed it. The effects were OK, and the acting was better than average. I thought Matt LeBlanc did a good job as Major West, so not like his other alter-ego "joey" I liked the movie because it was different. It was a remake of a television series and they director, writers, etc tried not going to far from what the series was based on. the family flies to space, the trip gets misdirected, they get lost, they have to find their way home. If I'm not mistaken, the voice of the robot sounded like the same one from the series, unless I'm hearing things.It would be nice if humanity could work on something like that now, so in the future we're not scrambling around trying to find another planet with sufficient resources to sustain life.
Hopeless movie.
posted on 10 Feb 2009Why would any director put his name on a production like this. This movie is as boring and stupid as you can get. Why did I go see this hopeless attempt at a sci fi movie. The script is flat and without any sense the actors play poorly and even the shooting is substandard. All in all save your money and go see something else.
Danger! Danger! -- Dr. Smith!
posted on 29 Jan 2009This film is deadly.The special effects and production values are the only reason it rates a "two". It has a big budget, some big names, no story, horrible miscasting, and the director must have taken a vacation during production.More than anything else, it comes to mind whenever someone asks, "why do great actors agree to appear in awful films?" I guess William Hurt and Gary Oldman needed the money. Even Mimi Rogers could do better. Matt LeBlanc... well, he will always be "Joey" to me. He probably could not do better.Maybe he was the only one who was cast right. The film was probably intended to be a spoof of the original. Except the original was kind of a spoof of classic science fiction. A spoof of a spoof? But then the dysfunctional family stuff is clearly trying to be serious, as are the deadly spiders.Whatever. This film did not work at any level. At least the TV series was good for laughs. Don't waste your time.
An Insult to the paying public
posted on 30 Aug 2009This Film ought to be the final nail in the coffin of the recent attempt to update long lost TV shows into movies. I know it won't be, because producers are lazy like that .
The film contains absolutely none of the humor or color of the TV show and for that reason I found it baffling why they should chose to update the show with all the best parts taken out.
The Plot makes no sense at all towards the end and the special effects aren't half as good as the makers think they are. The computer generated green alien thing , for example , looked exactly like , a computer generated green alien thing . Puff the magic dragon was more convincing.