Monsters, Inc. Movie
| Resolution | Size | Download | ||
|
|
1280x688 | 4477.6 MiB | 720p | |
|
|
720x386 | 1305.56 MiB | hidivx | |
|
|
608x326 | 617.94 MiB | divx | |
|
|
320x172 | 231.26 MiB | hpc | |
Storyline
TAGLINES
Monsters, Inc. : We Scare Because We Care
You Won't Believe Your Eye.
We Think They Are Scary, But Really We Scare Them!
Since the very first bedtime, all around the world, children have known that once their mothers and fathers tuck them in, and shut off the light, that there are MONSTERS hiding in their closets, waiting to emerge! What they don't know is: it's nothing personal. It's just their job.
James P. Sullivan (AKA "Sulley") and Mike Wazowski pick up their paychecks at Monsters Inc., the utility company that generates energy from the goose bumps of children. Sulley, the No. 1 scream-generator at the plant accidentally lets in a little girl into the monster world. Since monsters are actually terrified of children it's a major cause for alarm and a major headache for Sulley and Mike.
| John Goodman | James P. "Sulley" Sullivan |
| Billy Crystal | Mike Wazowski |
| Mary Gibbs | Boo/Mary |
| Steve Buscemi | Randall Boggs |
| James Coburn | Henry J. Waternoose III |
| Jennifer Tilly | Celia |
| Bob Peterson | Roz |
| John Ratzenberger | Yeti |
| Frank Oz | Fungus |
| Dan Gerson | Needleman/Smitty |
| Steve Susskind | Floor Manager |
| Bonnie Hunt | Flint |
| Jeff Pidgeon | Bile |
| Samuel Lord Black | George Sanderson |
| Jack Angel | Additional Voice |
| Peter Docter |
| David Silverman |
| Lee Unkrich |
Visitor Reviews
Entertaining Fare for the Whole Family
posted on 06 Aug 2009At one time or another, every kid in the world goes through the dread Monster-in-the-Closet experience; it's like one of Life's Rules. And for those who remember the chills of the dark bedroom, the stark terror of the moment the light goes out and you're left all alone with the Thing of your imagination, at long last there are some concrete answers to allay the fears of PCCSS (Post Childhood Closet Stress Syndrome), thanks to the good folks at Pixar. `Monsters, Inc.,' directed by Peter Docter, and featuring the talents of Billy Crystal and John Goodman, takes you behind the scenes of those haunted hours of childhood and explains the whole business. Which happens to be the whole point: It's a business. At Monsters, Inc., it's the job of all the scariest creatures around to supply the power for the city, which is generated by the screams of the children found on the other side of closet doors. The bigger the scream, the more power. From one floor of the factory that is Monsters, Inc., closet doors are affixed, assembly line style, so that the best of the best (or maybe that's the worst of the worst) can step through (it takes them into a child's bedroom) and do their thing. The screams are then collected in canisters and the city has power. The monsters earn points for the most scream power collected, and at the top of the list is James P. `Sulley' Sullivan (Goodman) a big, hairy, hulking monster who is assisted by the one-eyed (and it's a big one) Mike Wazowski (Crystal), a monster in his own right, though not of the scaring kind. But Sulley has some competition; the number two scarer is Randall Boggs (Steve Buscemi), more sinister than Sulley, and not beyond stooping to some underhanded schemes to get to the top spot on the roster. It's a tough racket, and Sulley and Mike have no idea just how low Randall is willing to go to get what he wants. It's a plot, however, that ultimately has a far-reaching effect on the whole city, and it falls to Sulley and Mike to try and put things aright with their world. Beginning with the premise, the story is clever and funny, and it's all brought to the screen with exemplary execution. The Pixar process is simply amazing; the depth and dimension of the animation is brilliant and gives new definition to this genre as an art form. Consider, for example, how very real the expressions and emotions of the characters are conveyed. That, combined with the fact that the story moves along with an excellent pace and perfect timing, makes for a satisfying and enjoyable time at the movies. Docter also assembled a top notch cast for his project. In addition to Crystal, Goodman and Buscemi (who are terrific), the cast includes James Coburn (Henry J. Waternoose), Jennifer Tilly (Celia), Bonnie Hunt (Flint), Mary Gibbs (Boo), Bob Peterson (Roz), John Ratzenberger (Yeti), Frank Oz (Fungus), Steve Susskind (Floor Manager), Jeff Pidgeon (Bile), Daniel R. Gerson (Needleman & Smitty) and Sam `Penguin' Black (George). Entertaining fare the whole family can enjoy, `Monsters, Inc.,' is a real experience for the little ones, and certainly presents something with which the adults in the audience will be able to identify, whether it be a memory from childhood or helping one's own child face the unknown of the Closet-in-the-Dark. It's a movie that actually offers a little bit more than meets the eye, and it's a demonstration of something I've always said, that it's a kind of magic.
And that's the magic of the movies. I rate this one 8/10.
My toddler has watched it over 20 times and it never gets old!
posted on 04 Aug 2009This DVD has been watched so many times in my house by my 2 year old daughter, we can quote much of it as it goes along. However, the fact that she relates to the cute little Boo and the big Jolly Giant Sulley makes this movie a very warm thing in our household indeed. **SPOILER ALERT**A very nice touch was how it turned out that making children laugh would give the Monster world a much more powerful source of energy, deal with how kids aren't so scared of monsters anymore and make the monsters stop scaring children as well. Good job and good creativity by Disney and Pixar. 10 out of 10 in this Dad's book!!!
Brilliant and unexpected
posted on 17 Jul 2009Monsters Inc. is without a doubt a well conceived movie. The writing was very good and the storyline, contrary to what one professional reviewer from CNN.com said, does NOT drag in the middle. If anyone has seen the early trailer of this movie, it doesn't give justice at all to the movie. John Goodmans portrayal of the big blue monster Sully is warm, and touching. His interaction with the little girl he names Boo is absolutely delightful. There are actually several scenes where some really heartwarming and tear-jerking things happen. This is very surprising considering Disney hasn't really released a tear-jerker since the Lion King in 1994. Unfortunately Billy Crystals character named Mike while very much in character for him is not nearly as visible in the picture as many movie goers would like. Although he is a main character, his humor is very subdued and he is not as sarcastically funny as he is capable of. Even though John Ratzenbergers (Cliff Clavin from Cheers) role is a small one, his character Yeti is very comical and provides a few moments of comic relief during a particularly tense section of the movie.The animation however is far more brilliant than Disney/Pixar's previous CGI releases Toy Story, A Bugs Life, and Toy Story II. The environments created for the characters is very cartoon-like in many respects, unlike the phenomenal realistic worlds created in this Summers hit Shrek. The animation is not as complex as Shrek was, but it is very obvious just looking at Sullys heavy fur coat to see the advances computer animation has taken since Jurassic Park rewrote the book on computer effects in 1993. All in all this movie is more geared to kids in the content of the dialogue. Parents will find the movie enjoyable, but don't expect as much sarcastic wit and sexual inuendos as Shrek contained as this is a Disney movie after all. I recommend seeing this movie, you'll get a real kick out of the animated short film Pixar created for this release that precedes the movie called "For the Birds". It didn't hurt to have Lucasfilm release it's first trailer for Star Wars Episode II with this movie either.
The best computer animated film of them all, and the most adult
posted on 17 Jul 2009Until now I couldn't bring myself to believe that computer animation was the equal of either stop motion animation or hand-drawn animation. All computer animated films looked a little (usually more than a little) too sterile, many were animated poorly ("Antz", "Shrek", "Final Fantasy"), and even the single unqualified success ("Toy Story 2") provided little evidence that a computer animated film COULD reach the heights other kinds of animation could. "Toy Story 2" had flawless character animation, but nothing as inspired as the best in "Tarzan" (released the same year, although I could have chosen almost any other Disney cartoon to make my point); effective art direction, but nothing to match "Fantasia" or "The Nightmare Before Christmas". And I thought that "Toy Story 2" was as good as the art was ever going to get.I was wrong. This is far better. And what's more, there's no sense whatever that the script (an unusually rich and uninhibited script) is bumping up against the limits of what the medium will allow. It's now been proven that computer animation CAN be just as good as any other kind.
Whether it will be allowed to be in future is another question, but for now, I'm hopeful. What we have here is computer animation's first ENTIRELY unalloyed artistic delight, with every character gracefully and characteristically animated, every virtual set just right and pleasing to look at, and an eye-tickling mastery of colour, light and shade that I thought would forever elude CGI artists.It's not fair to judge anything good as "Monsters, Inc." as though it were a children's movie, but I can't resist comparing it with "Shrek" - which emphatically IS a children's movie. "Monsters, inc." is admittedly ABOUT children, in a sort of a way. The inhabitants of Monstropolis rely on children's screams for their energy, and the central story is kicked off when one of the monsters accidentally brings a small child (which he calls "Boo") into the city. But we never see things from her point of view. We see things from the point of view of the monsters, who are all adults - and who, like most adults, see children as frightening, almost incomprehensible members of another species. And they ARE. To be sure, Wazowski comes to feel strong affection for Boo, but she never becomes more than a humanoid pet (which is not to demean the relationship). This is a story about adults looking at childhood from the outside."Shrek", of course, is a children's movie through and through. Its attention span is short, it has an unthinking mean streak, and children will have a whale of a time watching the central characters (the bigger they are, the more fun it is) act childishly and make poo-poo jokes. "Monsters, Inc." has too much genuine wit, characters too rich, a world with too much depth, and a story at once too coherent and too complicated, to be PRIMARILY a film for children. This is not to say children won't like it. Maybe they will.
(Who can say?) Here's the bonus: if they DO like it, it will (unlike "Shrek") actually have a beneficial effect. It will make them less frightened of the dark.
cool beans
posted on 13 Jul 2009Hey, I know I'm the type who loves those evil rated 'R' movies that ask for NC-17s, but I love this movie too. In fact, I love Pixar. They haven't made a bad movie yet (although I didn't care as much for 'A Bug's Life'), and this movie is no exception. This movie has a sophisticated sense of humor, and is just as satirical as it is endearing. Sure, you know the plot of the movie and the final result around 10 minutes (I'm guessing, i didn't look at my watch at all during the movie), but who cares? The movie is full of humor and great graphics. Unlike 'Shrek,' which I noticed somebody liked better, this movie wears its heart on its sleeve. 'Shrek' tried to make itself out to be an attack on Disney (and it was good for the first 20 minutes), but then it turns into an overly-sappy movie worthy of Disney.
This movie never pretends to be bitter and mean, but is a bit tongue-in-cheek. *Possible Spoilers* This is a movie which makes monsters in the closet friendly. They collect screams to power their city. But, the kids don't scare as easily, and there is a power shortage. By way of an evil plan, a closet gateway (read Door) is left around for Sully to find, and the kid terrorizes the monsters. The evil plan is to kidnap the kids and steal their screams to power the city.
Sully and his partner Mike try to put the girl back, and eventually succeed, but not before being exiled, returning, and such.
*End spoilers*Well, this movie fully understands subtle humor, and the college crowd (that's all that was there pretty much when I saw it) loved the movie. Even the gay joke is innocent, and subtle. The monsters are cuddly and friendly, and everything in this movie seems to work for the best. It gets a little sappy in a few spots, but it never pretended to be anything but happy, not to mention the kids probably love it. So, check out this movie...especially if you loved 'Toy Story.' (my favorite) 9/10
Once you have seen it you want to see it again!
posted on 11 Jul 2009Excellent made movie that brings "virtual reality" one step closer. Good story, very funny and extremely well made. The details are unbelievable! Just see the scene where Sully lays in the snow! And the roller-coaster scene with the doors... A must-see and a must-see-again!
Extra! Extra! Scream all about it!
posted on 01 Jul 2009Monsters, Inc. is a great movie. It has cute characters, a fun story and fantastic visuals. This is definitely a movie you can watch with the kids. You won't be bored and the kids won't pick up any nasty new words.The story of Monsters, Inc. revolves around Mike and Sully, the best scarers on the payroll at the Monsteropolis power plant. One day a human child is accidentally brought into the monster world and the race to find her and get her out of Monsteropolis is on. Mike and Sully are on the case but the somewhat shifty Randall is also showing undue interest in the child. Without giving away too much, let's just say that Randall is involved in an insidious plot to get more screams out of the kiddies while Mike and Sully just want to get her out of town so they can go back to work.Of course, these little problems always seem to get worse before they get better. The power plant is crawling with CDA (Child Detection Agency) agents making it tough for Mike and Sully to sneak the kid back through the door into her bedroom, not to mention keeping her out of Randall's clutches. Their efforts to send the tyke home culminate in a chase in and out of doors leading to exotic locals all over the human world. How does it end? Go see the movie.The best part of this movie is the imagination. The complex industrial environment of Monsters, Inc., the great details on the characters, the smooth colors and various cool visual effects. The casting of Billy Crystal and John Goodman in the lead roles works quite nicely, with Crystal's Mike Wazowski stealing the show. The ending chase through the power plant and in and out of the doors is fast-paced and exciting, with lots of action and great eye candy.The only thing I didn't like about this movie were Randall's blatant attempts to kill off Sully. I thought this was just a little to violent; it doesn't quite fit the rest of the movie.Overall, I give Monsters, INC. a score of 7/10. It is definitely worth watching and if you're still a kid at heart, it's worth owning.
Boogeymen with a Conscience
posted on 27 Jun 2009In the workaday world of monsters, Monsters, Inc. is the prime power provider. The workers at the company get the energy by emerging from kids' closets and scaring the beejeezus out of them. The subsequent screams are then bottled and used to power Monstropolis.The company's top scarer is James P. Sullivan, aka Sulley (voiced by John Goodman). His sidekick/best friend is Mike Wazowski (Billy Crystal). Here's how it works. Doors from kids' rooms appear from a giant warehouse in the company's behemoth building. The scarer opens the door and steps into the kid's bedroom and scares the heck out of the little tyke. As the screams come, they fill up empty canisters, the kind in which one might find helium for balloons, which the sidekick keeps at the ready. Then the monster steps out, the leaderboard reflects the changes (they're very competitive there, you know), and another door is procured. The sidekick takes care of all of the paperwork. But kids aren't getting scared the way they used to, and there's a power shortage afoot.There's one huge rule, though. Never come in contact with one of the kids, or any of the stuff from their rooms. The kids are toxic and will kill you on contact. (At one point, a particularly gruesome monster comes out of the room with a tiny sock velcroed to his fur; an emergency is declared, and a crack Kid Detection team races in to decontaminate the scene - and the monster, who gets quite a nasty shave. It's all innocuous enough, but it's also reflective of current events, although the movie was certainly written a while ago.)One evening, Sulley offers to do the paperwork so Mike can go on a date with his beloved Celia (Jennifer Tilly). There aren't supposed to be any doors left on the floor after hours, but there one is, and Sulley's just inquisitive enough to open it. Whoops! A kid comes out. Hilarity ensues. Sulley races to get Mike, and they both panic. I mean, think of it! A KID, there in Monstropolis! They fear for their lives! And of course all the while the kid, whom Sulley names Boo, is being a cute, adorable, curious little rugrat. This film was done by the Pixar people, the same nice folks who brought Toy Story and A Bug's Life to you. The animation is wonderful, although I'm not sure it's quite on par with Toy Story as far as the monsters go. The animation of the little girl, however, is fabulous. The animators must have kids of their own, because every nuance I can think of that a little kid would have was captured beautifully in this movie. The actors providing the voices are a lot of fun, too. Whoever cast John Goodman and Billy Crystal is probably suffering from a dislocated shoulder from patting themselves on the back so much. The two stars have great chemistry, bordering on Laurel and Hardy-ish.This is a bellyacher of a film, although admittedly it's not one that the intellectual snob would particularly enjoy. While the audience is the teeter-totter set, there is no overabundance of flatulence jokes - in fact, there aren't any. This is good clean (literally) fun.
scarring isn't so easy...
posted on 21 Jun 2009Like in our world, a huge company has to have the perfect management to survive. What happens in the monster's world then ? The rules are the same. Cheating isn't fair, the energy is needed day by day, and being in the top is the only call. It's a funny story with nice effects, where, after all, the good beats up the bad. Kids, watch it!
This one is on my list to buy
posted on 17 Jun 2009This movie was absolutely funny. John Goodman does an excellent voice for Sully. The animation was great. The facial expressions with the voices were out of this world. This movie is for everyone. It seems the animation is getting better and better, but you still have to get the perfect voices for each character. Steve Buscemni plays as slime ball again. This seems to be the only character he does well. Billy Crystal was great too, but as I said John Goodman was the best. The story was consistent and funny through out. I was surprised to hear the voice of James Coburn. The ending left room for a part II if they want to do one, but it will be very hard to beat this one. 9/10
Steal a couple hours of heaven - SEE THIS MOVIE
posted on 15 Jun 2009Monsters, Inc. is satisfying on many levels and to the posters who complain that Pixar is getting too predictable I say "get a life". It's a blockbuster kid's movie for cryin' out loud, not an entry into an independant film festival.I look forward to the day when we can buy our own copy and I don't cringe at the thought of sitting thru repeated viewings. I'd say that Toy Story 2 had more of an emotional hook with the Jessie story line. (My 7 year old daughter and I cry everytime we watch it.) No tears shed for Monster's Inc. but we absolutely loved the main characters.Pixar movies are like my sister's chocolate chip cookies - good every time.
Short of winning the academy award for best animated feature, yet a great movie
posted on 15 Jun 2009Disney makes films which give us happiness and warmth while Pixar gives us terrific animation. Together, they form a multi-billionaire industry making terrific films which the audience and the critics love to watch. And this is one of them.Monsters Inc. has a very odd and different plot. Monsters scare children to provide electricity by collecting the children's screams but they are scared of the children themselves are they think that they would get contaminated by touching them. Sullivan is the best scarer of the company Monsters Inc. and he, together with his best friend Mike, work as the best employees in Monsters Inc. But then when Sullivan leaves the door to the children's room open by mistake, he invites an unwelcoming guest, a small, terribly cute girl called Boo. And then the world goes upside down.A team of monsters are in search of the girl while Mike and Sullivan try to rescue the girl by sending her back to the door where she came from.But then they come to know that their own boss is involved with their rival and they try to stop them from taking the child by putting in all their effort and strength.Now, after this summary, let me tell you some of the good points of the movie:1) Excellent animation. Monsters are not shown scary and so it is a movie for all. Even the young toddlers would fall in love with the monsters.2) Boo is too cute and I fell in love with her the moment I saw her. She was not shown too stupid and so her role fitted well in the movie.3) Sullivan's voicing was great and I felt touched when he fought for Boo.4) The yeti was really funny in the short role he had got. It was good to see that they showed Himalayas and didn't stick to one place only.5) Mike was really funny and his voicing was almost perfect.6) The plot is very different and not the same monotonous type.Now, there were some bad points in the movie:1) Celia's voicing was done badly. Her voice could have been better.2) I found it stupid when they showed that Sullivan's boss wanted to kidnap all children and this was his motive. It was very stupid to show that this was the reason that he was bad.3) Roz's voice made me almost doze off. Please speak a bit louder and clearer next time, grandma.4) Mike got a bit annoying when he got angry at his friend Sullivan. He did not really look angry and his voice was more of a nagging type than an angry one.Overall, this movie was great but not as good as Shrek Still it deserves an 8 out of 10.
You won't believe your eye.' after watching this Pixar masterpiece!
posted on 13 Jun 2009After you have seen Pixar's Monsters, Inc.' two things are apparent about monsters. One is that humans think monsters are scary, and two, is that humans really scare them! I cannot remember the last time I enjoyed a cartoon or a movie so much. I know that Pixar has had great success with many animated movies in the past. However, I feel that Monsters Inc.' out-classes such titles as, Toy Story', Shrek' and A Bug's Life' by far. With its funny story, great characters and wonderful voiceovers, Monsters, Inc.' will be a tough act to follow in the world of movie animation. Take a look at the monsters who say We Scare Because We Care'.Monsters, Inc. is the largest scare factory in the monster world. The top kid scarer is James "Sully" Sullivan, a huge intimidating monster with blue fur, large purple spots and horns. His scare assistant and best friend is Mike Wazowski, a lime green, opinionated, feisty, one-eyed monster. Scaring children isn't such an easy job, monsters believe children are toxic and that direct contact with them would be catastrophic. Inside the factory can be found the factory's crab-like CEO Henry J. Waternoose, the beguiling serpent-haired receptionist Celia and the sarcastic chameleon monster, Randall Boggs, who schemes to replace Sully as Monsters Inc.'s top Scarer. Visiting from the human world is Boo, a tiny girl who turns Mike and Sully's world upside-down.There is so much to like about Monsters, Inc.'. The team from Pixar really give great attention to detail when they bring out an animated feature. I really like the computer animated graphics, as many of these characters to me seem to be real. The many facial expressions these monsters have are just wonderful. They were so funny, that they made me laugh many times. The sounds used in Monsters Inc' were of the finest quality and help to define the monsters and the world they live in. I also like the story that Pixar made for this film. Having doors between the monsters world and ours is clever. Also having the story follow the fortunes of Mike and Sully is good, as it is never dull or boring when it come to those two characters. Add in the what Boo does to the story, I feel it makes for the perfect script. I enjoy how this story ends, as it made me feel very satisfied for watching.The characters that were invented for this film are some of the best I have ever seen. My favourite is the simple, but idiotic eyeball, Mike Wazowski'. Almost every time I saw his eye appear onscreen, he would make me laugh. Mike's best friend, is James Sully' Sullivan, and scaring kids is what he is really good at. Mike and Sully are a great team. There characters show the audience that real friends stick together through thick and thin. The other good characters include Mike's love interest Celia. The nicknames the pair call each other are hilarious. I cannot forget to mention one of the main stars of the show, Boo (Mary Gibbs). She is the little child who manages to make her way inside Monsters, Inc.'. I love her funny cry of Mike-Wazowski'. Yet with the good comes the bad. The meanest monster in Monstropolis' is a snaky chameleon character, called Randal Boggs. He is trying to become the number one scream collector at Monsters, Inc'. Another character not be trusted or liked at Monsters Inc' is Henry J. Waternoose, the CEO of the plant. He is a cross between a crab and spider, and only wants his employees to scare children and make him successful.The voiceovers used in this film were out of this world'. Having stars such as Billy Crystal as Mike, John Goodman as Sully, Jennifer Tilly as Celia, James Coburn as Henry and Steve Buscemi as Randall, were all perfect choices to voice each character. You can actually picture Crystal as Mike, the talkative sidekick and Goodman as Sully, the big cuddly blue Monster, who really does care about everyone. I love Roger Ebert's cheeky comment in reference to Jennifer Tiley's character of Celia, `What she (Celia) sees in him (Mike) is beyond me, although if there is anyone who can figure out how to have sex with a green eyeball, that would be Jennifer Tilly. I can imagine her brassy voice: 'Blink! Blink!'.'
There are some great scenes in Monsters, Inc'. I like almost every scene with Mike, as he is crazy, funny and stupid. Sully's introduction with Boo is also a highlight, as we all see what a little child can do to the number one scarer'. Then what follows is the funny scene where Mike says the silly line of `This is for the up-coming company play put that thing back where it came from or so help me'. Watch out for the play on the DVD, it is a classic extra feature. Another entertaining sequence in the film is the rollercoaster chase that Mike and Sully have to do, contending with hundreds of conveyor-driven doors to make sure that Boo is safe.I recently had the chance to compare the other animated film which has been released at the moment, Ice Age'. While I know it has had good reviews from many people, I found to be nowhere near as good as what 'Monsters, Inc.' was or is. Pixar is truly talented at bringing us movies, which are normally thought to be just for children'. However, this movie can be enjoyed by many different groups as its genre suggests, such as the whole family'. I know being a kid helps me for starters, but if you cannot like Mike and the gang' then there is something wrong. I wait in anticipation for what Pixar brings us next. If you are a true movie fan, then do yourself a favour and show that you care' by watching this animated classic.CMRS gives 'Monsters, Inc': 5 (Brilliant Film)
A hilarious computer-animated movie.
posted on 01 Jun 2009"Monsters, Inc." is a hilarious computer-animated movie like "Toy Story" and "Toy Story 2". John Goodman is hilarious as James P. Sullivan (Sulley), same with Billy Crystal as Mike Wazowski, Sulley's best friend. If you have a DVD player, you must own it on DVD. It will be part of your collection and I guarantee you won't be disappointed. A hilarious film.10/10 stars!
contrite and Cecilius! Monsters galore!
posted on 28 May 2009How an organisation of the complexity and might of Disney could stoop to using Monsters as central characters is beyond belief? What has become of happy warm entities we could relate to. Even the simplest of brains which could employ that a Monster speaks of terror and malice. While dwarfs bring shortly and woodland creatures play for fun, Monsters bite, or perhaps I should Monster Inc might bite. Watch at your peril! As I am sure you will. But please don't forget Disney isn't about theme parks in that it must now persuade others to look at VHS product. Come on if Disney can'y who can. Recently a friend commented on the increasing influence satellite television plays in Disney's derivation, but I not convinced. Not this week anyway.
BEST DISNEY MOVIE IN A COUPLE OF YEARS
posted on 26 May 2009Best disney movie in a couple of years. I loved this movie and took my niece and nephew to see it. I think that my mom loved it the most though. I give this movie 10/10. It was good. And John Goodman played a good character and so did Billy Crystal. the little girl Boo, was a cute little girl. When this movie hits video i am gonna buy it.
Funny and creative
posted on 24 May 2009This film had really cool, imaginative animation. Plus the plot was entertaining. I liked the idea of children's screams powering Monstropolis, cute and funny. The little girl, Boo, had such a funny, little laugh. I liked how all the monster characters had their own personalities. From the striking colors to the way the hair moved on Sully to the snow blizzard, the CGI was great. I also liked the expected chase scene because it was a little different in this movie. Here, Sully, Mike, and Boo travel through doors and come out in different places and out of different doors as they are being chased by the evil Randall as they search for Boo's door. I just really liked the uniqueness of these scenes. Also, the final scene was touching, and we get to see how Sully's character transform from a scarer to someone who just wants to make kids laugh. FINAL VERDICT: I highly recommend this for kids as well as adults. It is entertaining, cute, and funny.



greatest animated movie ever!
posted on 10 Aug 2009This was a movie that taught a valuable lesson to the children who
saw it. It was also enjoyable for adults on another level. I found the story well written and the concepts so original and imaginative.
I went to see it without children and was glad that I did. I loved it!