Panic Room Movie
| Resolution | Size | Download | ||
|
720x300 | 845.58 MiB | hidivx | |
|
640x268 | 490.96 MiB | divx | |
|
320x132 | 187.52 MiB | ipod | |
|
320x132 | 200.5 MiB | hpc | |
Storyline
TAGLINES
It was supposed to be the safest room in the house
After her divorce, Meg Altman and her daughter Sarah move into an old-fashioned house with one very modern addition: a "panic room" which is virtually impossible to break into, designed for refuge during a home invasion. In their first night in the house a trio of thieves do break in and Meg and Sarah rush into the panic room. However, the intruders are looking for something inside the panic room, and given the recent move the room's hotline to the police hasn't been hooked up yet. Worse, Sarah is diabetic and the room doesn't contain any sugar...
| Forest Whitaker | Burnham |
| Kristen Stewart | Sarah Altman |
| Jared Leto | Junior |
| Patrick Bauchau | Stephen Altman |
| Jodie Foster | Meg Altman |
| Dwight Yoakam | Raoul |
| Ann Magnuson | Lydia Lynch |
| Ian Buchanan | Evan Kurlander |
| Andrew Kevin Walker | Sleepy Neighbor |
| Paul Schulze | Officer Keeney |
| Mel Rodriguez | Officer Morales |
| Ken Turner | SWAT Cop |
| David Fincher |
7.00 out of 10 (28292 votes)
Visitor Reviews
Nobody does feminine fear and rage better than Jody Foster.
posted on 28 Aug 2009----POSSIBLE SPOILER----Panic Room is a thriller set in the NYC brownstone home of Meg Altman [Jody Foster] recently divorced with a young teenage daughter [Kristen Stewart]. The brownstone has a secret high tech `safe room'; legend has it the former owner left a fortune hidden in the building. It's Meg's first night in her new digs and she's just getting familiar with the phone and electronics system. Burnham, Raoul and Junior [Forest Whitaker, Dwight Yoakam, and Jared Leto, respectively] stop by looking for the money. Burnham installed the safe room system, Raoul nursed the former resident, and Junior is packing the heat. Meg and the kid head for the safe room, the intruder's breakout sledgehammers and other assorted goodies of mass destruction. A contest between brain and brawn ensues; in the end the bad guys are at least one `right-hand-man' short. [See the film to get the meaning of this last comment!]Panic Room is the best of the current litter of thriller / suspense films. The story keeps you on the edge of your seat [or maybe under it], without using Hollywood's dumb video tricks. The plot is focused and fast paced, the story is well scripted, and the acting sharp and expressive. Events are unpredictable leaving viewers to guess what's up next, even having seen the previews. All the action takes place within the brownstone, making the situation all the more focused. The exceptional cinematography starts with the rectilinear layout [squared angles] of the opening credits against NYC buildings; this is a clue of the photography yet to come.Nobody does feminine fear and rage better than Jody Foster, just ask Clarice Starling in Silence of The Lambs. Foster is at her prime in this film. The three stooges of break and enter, led by Forest Whitaker, are a case study of `honor among thieves' [or lack thereof] as they are foiled at each turn of events.
What a disappointment!
posted on 22 Aug 2009Having seen this, I can honestly say that it's one of the most disappointing movies I have ever seen so far. I thought it was going to be amazing and beautifully crafted, but unfortunately it wasn't. It has such a ridiculous plot, this movie is called "Panic Room", but I don't understand why it's called like that; it was supposed to be called "Safety Room" or whatever.I'm really sorry that Jodie Foster couldn't save it even a little. Her performance wasn't as outstanding as it was when she portrayed Clarice in "The Silence of the Lambs". I expected more from her performance. The acting wasn't convincing at all. It was terrible. I wasn't scared at all throughout the whole movie, especially when Jodie Foster and her daughter screamed; I considered it was funny, they didn't really know how to make their performances believable. I have no clue what's wrong with Jodie Foster; maybe she's tired of movies. Anyway the acting wasn't the only bad thing in this movie: the ending was disappointing as well and it was so predictable and foolish. I can't believe I thought it was going to be interesting. Now I see how wrong I was. Overall, I'd not recommend this movie to anybody even though it features Jodie Foster. Since the house was good looking and dark and also it had some touches of good suspense I rate it a 5/10.
One of the best films of the year so far!
posted on 20 Aug 2009I waited eager with anticipation for this film as I am a big fan of David Fincher, he is a great director, Seven was one of the best thrillers ever made and the Game and Fight Club were two eerie and surreal films that demand watching. The Panic Room is a great film, simply because the Direction is excellent and the acting top notch, these both combine to create a tense and exciting thriller. While the story is fairly simple and far more straight forward than Finchers other films, in particular the Game and Fight Club, the film sets out to keep us on the edge of our seats with suspense and successfully does that. Fincher directs with style and perfectly captures the dark and unsettling atmosphere the house provides, the cinematography in this is very good. There is some stylish camera movement that weaves through the house and this is used to good effect as the camera will smoothly drift from one floor of the house to another.
The acting is great in particular from Jodie Foster, Kristen Stewart (as Fosters daughter) and the reluctant crook played by Forrest Whittaker. There are also some elements of humour incoperated in the film just to lighten the tone every now and again. Jodie Foster is at the top of her game and she also looks very good in this as the mother who turns at to be a pain in the ass for the three crooks as the film turns out as almost a very dark and errie Home Alone without the annoying blond kid who can't act (sorry Mackauly but you can't mate). They never try to make Foster so tough she turns into a Lara Croftesque action woman, just an intelligent woman doing her best to keep her daughter from harm. The film never drags and while this doesn't compare to some of Finchers other films it still has his trademark atmosphere and is certainly one of the best films that has come out in 2002 so far. 8/10
Amazing suspense...
posted on 18 Aug 2009Although I would agree that it was not top-quality work from Fincher, or at least not on the level as his previous films, it is one of the best suspense films i've ever seen. The storyline was rather straight-foward but it did not take away from the greatness in being a great movie. At times i could actually feel my heart naturally beating faster at numerous times. Great acting, great flow of events, and even a great ending, which kind of taught a lesson.
Claustrophobic Thriller!
posted on 16 Aug 2009"Panic Room" directed by David Fincher, tries to copy the style of Alfred Hitchcock. It is a creepy dark old house movie that contains many twists and turns in its plot, and holds a few surprises as well. Meg Altman (Jodie Foster)is separated and has moved into a large old brownstone town house with her daughter Sarah (Kristen Stewart), formerly owned by an eccentric and paranoid multi-millionaire. The furniture has not all arrived and many boxes remain unpacked. In the house, the former owner had built a "panic room", a room that could be sealed off from the rest of the house and hide the residents if danger threatened. As luck would have it, three burglars intent on finding a large amount of hidden cash left by the former owner, break into the house. Burnham (Forest Whitaker) was the man who designed and built the panic room. Junior (Jared Leto) had worked for the eccentric. Junior has brought along a mysterious brooding and masked third member, Raoul (Dwight Yoakum) to help out. Of course, mother and daughter flee to the panic room and most of the rest of the film deals with the cat and mouse games played to get them to open the door. Burnham just wants to get the loot. Junior harbors a secret and Raoul is a ticking time bomb. Meanwhile Meg's ex-husband Stephen who had been alerted by Meg before communication was cut off, arrives on the scene and is used by the criminals to coax the women out of the room. Finally, Meg is tricked out into the open and the crooks gain entry to the panic room. Then we learn that Sarah, who is still inside, has an unnamed illness which requires her to have an injection to survive. But how will she get her injection? By the way, this "illness" suggests diabetes although the disease is never mentioned. An injection of insulin would require a specific measured dosage and the patient would have to eat something immediately after the injection. In the film Sarah, appears to be given a pre-mixed injection but does not have anything to eat. If this was the case, she would have relapsed into the comatose like state she was in before. Anyway, eventually everything is sorted out and justice prevails. Jodie Foster is excellent as always and young Kristen Stewart does Ok as Sarah. Whitaker is good as the bad guy with a conscience, Leto is suitably sleazy as Junior but country crooner Yoakum is positively frightening as the psychopathic Raoul. "Panic Room" is a pretty good claustrophobic thriller.
Great suspense with excellent cast and director
posted on 14 Aug 2009This movie was a really pleasant surprise for me. Though I am a real fan of the other fincher movies (especially "se7en" and "the game"), I didn't really now what to expect from this one.The story didn't sound very original, but like stuff that could make a great movie in the hands of the right director.Well, Fincher was the right director. With this movie about a young divorced woman and her daughter being trapped in a security room of their house while criminals trying to lure them out in my opinion is his very best work so far.Despite some little plot holes that are very easily forgiven, "Panic Room" not only is a great flick, but a wonderful pice of art. I think so because even though the whole movie takes place in one big house, director David Fincher and cinematographers Conrad W. Hall and Darius Khondji manage to create some truly unique shots you haven't seen in any other movies so far.I don't want to go too much into detail, but if you are even a little interested in the art of film making, you have to see this movie.Of course I also highly recommend it for fans of Fincher and/or Jodie Foster.I talked to some guys who didn't really understand what I meant when I told them how great the (digitally enhanced) camera movements were, but that was only because they weren't really movie fans who would recognize these kinds of details.My conclusion: you might argue that the plot is not very original, but the cinematography alone justifies to see this movie at least once.I give it 9 out of 10 points.
Slam bang thriller!
posted on 14 Aug 2009This must be Fincher`s best outing yet.Better than both "The Game" and "Fight Club" after my opinion.But,of course-miles away from the masterpiece "Seven"."Panic Room is a very exciting and intense thriller,similar to many of Alfred Hitchcock`s movies.All actors involved gives strong performances,and especially Forest Whitaker.He has a very nervous look on his face and as he says;he don`t hurt people. A very quiet and anxious guy. Jodie Foster is always good and country singer Dwight Yoakam is pretty mean as the most brutal of the three men.He acts good.Jared Leto was great in "Requiem For A Dream" and gives another strong role here. Enough of this information.What I think? "Panic Room is one of the 10 years best thrillers and is a MUST SEE for everyone who like a good movie.It has a creepy and dark atmosphere and some of the camera work is outstanding! Especially the slow-motion sequences.Great! The way Fincher uses the camera when they are going to break in is an extremely memorable part.This movie would not been the same if Fincher hadn`t directed it. Advice;run to the nearest cinema and watch David Fincher`s PANIC ROOM today.Rating-9/10
an intense ride
posted on 14 Aug 2009Meg is in the middle of a divorce with her husband Stephen. Meg's friend Lydia has found Meg and her daughter a new home, only just coming onto the market. The house is a massive four story house, that has everything they need and more. On inspection of the house, Evan Kurlander the estate agent shows them a secret room the house holds; a panic room. Used for home protection, the panic room is an isolated room which no one can enter once you are inside. The night that Meg and Sarah move in, three men break into the house, after a valuable that the house holds. Once Meg and Sarah lock themselves inside the panic room, things go from bad to worse. The object the three men; Junior, Burnham and Raoul, are after resides in the panic room, stopping at nothing to get inside the panic room.Panic Room is another highly crafted film, adding into David Fincher's great arsenal of films. Tightly constructed and moving at a face pace, Panic Room grabs a hold of you from the get go, and doesn't relinquish. The room itself is a small, claustrophobic area, creating a wonderfully tight atmosphere. While the house itself is a massive area, it also holds a claustrophobic feel, creating even more tension, as for the predominant part of Panic Room, we don't leave its walls.David Fincher's direction has such grace and elegance, from all the seamless tracking shots around the house. They move so smoothly, and are perfectly integrated with the computer generated shots, when shifting between rooms through the walls and ceilings. Fincher is a meticulous director, and it does show. Every shot has this perfection, using the surroundings and actor to their ultimate limit.Character development has been kept at a minimal from David Koepp's script. Your not given a lot of depth to them through verbal conversations, yet you are given so much from the actors performances, creating idiosyncrasies which tell you more about the character than the verbal inclinations. Jodie Foster has such a strong presence on the screen. While Meg is fragile on the outside, Foster gives her such inner strength. Kristen Stewart is the opposite to Foster, Sarah has real outer strength, yet fragile on the inside, which Kristen Stewart captures perfectly. Jared Leto is great as the hot headed Junior. Forest Whitaker does well as Burnham, also Dwight Yoakam as the twisted Raoul.Panic Room is a wonderfully, tightly constructed thriller from one of our modern day great directors.
Almost Home Alone 4 (Carry on Panicking)
posted on 08 Aug 2009If anyone can remember the famous 'Likely Lads' TV episode, whereby the lads go to great lengths to avoid knowing the England football result before they watch the highlights on TV, you'll know what I mean. This is very exciting (sad, I know) but I haven't seen a single review of this film; nor have I heard anything about it; nor did I get any vibes from the fellow audience (who numbered about ten in a large cinema).Basically, I wanted to write a review and not be swayed in any manner by other opinions. Well, here goes. What the hell was Jodie Foster doing in this load of old rubbish? I mean, 'Hannibal' was rubbish without her, so I guess she may have been making this movie at roughly the same time? Why? Why? Why? Is it meant to be a comedy or what? Even Jodie Foster's normally impeccable acting was reduced to mediocrity in this unbelievable tale of a so-called 'panic room'. The big mystery is why didn't they come out before carnage, mayhem, and bad lines abounded?! If the papers tomorrow rate this movie I'm an ITV Digital's Monkey's Uncle. I know that there are always some bits of a 'thriller' which are bound to contain far-fetched plot-lines, but I seemed to be doing five-bar gates of the flaws and running out of fingers after the first ten minutes. I did enjoy the credits, thankfully at the start of the movie where they belong; but, that aside, and I can think of no other credit-worthy points to make. It really was like an adult version of 'Home Alone', complete with daughter and mother; but the humour was more akin to the 'Carry On' series. Perhaps I'll discover, when I read other reviews on this site (as I managed not to peep once during navigation to this area), that I am in a minority, in which case I'll know I've gone completely loopy. The reason I wanted to see this movie was because I am not unfamiliar with the ability to have a good panic, but panic I did not. Thank God for the trailer of 'Killing me Softly'. At least I had a good gawk at my number one pin-up Heather Graham, but even that didn't improve my mood sufficiently to be able to enjoy this load of all codswallop!
Not up to David Fincher standard
posted on 04 Aug 2009Good movie form great director, David Fincher. The movie is good but still not as satisfying as his past work like Fight Club and Se7en. I some how expected more from him and his movie. But this movie involve only in the panic and her house, which make the movie somehow a bit boring. Nothing much occurred in the movie. So I would say that it is the least favorite film of him, but at least better than Alien 3.Max: 6/10
Why this is the greatest film of 2002 (so far)...
posted on 23 Jul 2009Because most of the films released so far this year have been really dull and uninteresting, whereas this film actually engages the viewer for more than twenty minutes. Intense thrillers don't get much better than this. I suggest you go see this film with a large audience. If the audience has as much fun as mine did, you will be cheering and gasping with all the rest of 'em. Never in all my years have I ever witnessed a movie-going audience cheer and applaud at a particularly intense moment in any film. "Panic Room" actually makes you fear for the lives of Jodie Foster's Meg Altman and her daughter (who oddly enough is a bit of a tomboy--go fig).Speaking of Jodie Foster, she has never been better. It's a wonder why we never see more of her in film. After her two Oscar wins before she was thirty, one would think that she would be the most highly sought after actress in Hollywood. But, being the choosy woman she is, she only plays in the films that interest her. And it's no surprise what drew her to this role. On one hand, Meg Altman is a bit of a paranoid, borderline clautrophobe insistent on moving into a very large New York townhouse with a special "panic room" she can hide in if worse comes to worse (which it actually does--on the first night in the house!). On the other, she is a tough, resourceful woman who remarkably shines through the toughest binds, especially when attending to her diabetic daughter. This is not too much to give away, as the film manages to convey this highly suspenseful twist through a very subtle and implicit means. Very little of this film is out-right revealed. You have to pay attention, if you blink for just a minute you may miss something important.David Fincher does it again by taking a relatively simple story line (three burglars break into a large house to find a hidden stash of cash while the two inhabitants are inside) and weaves this brilliant thriller into a wonderful thrill ride. I'll even go so far to give Kudos to Jared Leto, Forest Whitaker, and the surprisingly convincing yet purely EVIL Dwight Yoakam for their ecstatic performances as the three burglars. Jared Leto is probably the most inept and ridiculous burglar out there and one cannot help but laugh at his banter with Dwight's Raoul and Forest's Burnham. That banter though quickly subsides (thankfully, as too much may have ruined the film) as the real action begins...I won't say much more to keep the fun from being wasted. Have some fun this Easter weekend and go to see this great film. You won't be sorry!
fundamentally stupid
posted on 21 Jul 2009there's one thing that REALLY irritated me in this movie and that's the notion that a diabetic in need of an insulin shot needs to be given sugar. If she needs an insulin shot its because her blood sugar is high and needs to be brought down not increased. Sugar is useful for diabetics who have overdosed on their medication and need their sugar levels brought up. Its just such a fundamentally stupid error to have in this movie..which on the whole i thought was pretty fundamentally stupid anyway. I mean i can suspend credibility to some extent in a movie but sometimes enough is enough.
Not as good as I had thought it would be
posted on 13 Jul 2009I was disappointed with this movie. It just seemed flat to me. From the very beginning it doesn't seem to make much sense, because you wonder why this woman would choose to buy this monstrosity of a house. It is NOT a fit. I think that the director and writer should have taken the claustrophobia of being in a small closed-in space and run with that more....hello, the name of the movie IS "PANIC Room". You see, there didn't need to be all the bloody violence. Terror in the captives' minds would have been scarier
i.e. real panic and not so much fighting back from little Sir Jody. I did like the acting, especially Jared Leto, and, I do agree, the daughter was kind of a freak. All in all, a 6 out of 10.
`Panic Room' is a good `B' movie that makes you glad you don't live in a mansion in the heart of NYC.
posted on 11 Jul 2009New York City has become the outpost of terror, certified from the skies on 9/11 and renewed in the `Home Alone' half-brother, `Panic Room.' Being beset upon by larcenous strangers in New York has been a pervasive fear of visitors as well as brownstone owners. This film brings home that fear in a frightfully large house Jodi Foster and her daughter buy after her divorce from a wealthy financier.Mom and daughter hide from intruders in the panic room, a bomb-shelter like fortress built for just such intrusions. Although it would seem a claustrophobic setup, Director David Fincher (`Seven' and `Fight Club') moves everyone as smoothly as his careening camera up and down staircases and through partially opened doors.The three goons have varying degrees of wit and humanity, most of which belongs to Forest Whitaker, who best expresses the difficulties that come from not being committed to taking all or nothing. He has too many issues besides just robbery to distract him from the ruthlessness his partners come to so easily.Jodi Foster is her usually intelligent agent of righteousness, a Clarice Starling with divorce and diabetic kid as baggage. Although Nicole Kidman was to have this role, Foster has the edge on tough and Kidman had her scare-fest in `The Others' a year ago.`Panic Room' is a good `B' movie that makes you glad you don't live in a mansion in the heart of NYC. It also subtly comments on the dangers almost always accompanying young divorcees and their children. The film has updated the `Home Alone' family situation and added some terrifying effects, so just enjoy an old-fashioned scary-mansion story. In this film, there is nothing new to learn about women, children, and homes besieged by modern terror.
David Fincher at his best.
posted on 07 Jul 2009I would first like to point out that this movie is the perfect example of the genius that is David Fincher. No other director that I can think of of the top of my head, except perhaps Ridley Scott, could have successfully adapted this type of a story to the silver-screen, let alone make it as GOOD as he did. This is, to put it short, the most suspenseful film I have ever watched. Upon leaving the theater I was so tense that I felt like yelling as loud as I could to vest the feeling. And I loved ever second of it. From the first five minutes, until the credits began to roll, not a single sound came from the audience witnessing the spectacle. Not one. Not a cough, not a laugh, not a clearing of a throat. The entire crowd was caught in Fincher's brilliance. He has, perhaps, out done himself. I cannot possible imagine how he will ever be able to top this movie. But, I pray he does. He seems, with every movie he has released, to improved on aspects from the one before. Se7en was much better than Alien3, The Game, though not better in my opinion, showed him experimenting and trying to make it better. Fight Club was a major improvement cinematography wise(and to some, plot wise) from all predecessor's, and now, Panic Room, in my opinion, has topped them all in every aspect. My recommendation is that you watch it. Then watch it again. You'll like it even more the second time. Trust me. 10/10
Don't Panic - It's just a room
posted on 07 Jul 2009Panic Room shows that just because you have a place of refuge in times of trouble does not mean it is always the safest place to go. After being left by her husband for another women Meg (Jodie Foster) and her daughter Sarah (Kristen Stewart) move into an Upper West Side 3 story brownstone home which belonged to a deceased millionaire. There is a panic room off the master bedroom which is impossible to get in from the outside. Foster, who is claustrophobic and her daughter who is diabetic are forced to hide in the room when three intruders break in. The intruders are under the impression that the house is empty. Foster tries to drown her divorce feelings in the bath tub and with a bottle of wine on the first night. She wakes up in the middle of the night and notices the intruders on the monitor in the panic room. Foster is able to wake Stewart from an upper floor and make it back to the panic room before the intruders, after a few rides on the house's elevator. Burnham (Forest Whitaker) is a security expert who also builds panic rooms. Whitaker wants some fast cash that is stored in the panic room. Whitaker's partner Junior (Jared Leto) is the grandson of the deceased owner. The third intruder, Raoul (Dwight Yoakum) is a fight ready to happen. Foster and Whitaker do a wonderful job playing these roles. Whitaker who is usually the big hearted character is almost able to turn around, but in the end still shows the softness. Foster brings a little Clarice (Silence of the Lambs) out in the movie with her domineer. These are two great characters that help bring the darker version of Home Alone (1990) out. The elements used to emphasize the theme of Panic Room were the lighting and the music. Both of these elements add to the suspense and dangerous feelings in the movie. The lighting in the Panic Room was low key throughout most of the movie. The scene where Foster is on a mission to get her daughter released from the panic room and she is disabling all the cameras in the home one by one really shows how the low key makes the movie seem almost black. The music puts a twist on your typical horror film music. The Panic Room leaves me with the impressions that even a steel framed door and four walls of concrete cannot always keep you safe.
Is the Panic Room, the safest room in the house?
posted on 05 Jul 2009Movie choices are often a matter of taste. I personally don't like olives, but many do even when it's not soaking in a martini. Jodie Foster's new film, PANIC ROOM, was anything but an olive for me. Most films deal with conflict of one sort or another, good films take the movie goer to the next level referred to as "complication". Foster's character finds herself with her child in conflict when intruders invade her home and seek the safety of the panic room. The plot becomes an emotional complication when Foster's character becomes trapped outside the panic room with her child trapped inside with the intruders. That's good story telling with a twist. The film is edited especially well and does not lose the audience with a series of quick action scenes. So, here's my suggestion, stop sucking on olives and go see the PANIC ROOM.
I really need to stop listening to the critics
posted on 03 Jul 2009This movie was just awful. Isn't the point of a thriller or suspenseful movie to, well, thrill and cause suspense? Because there wasn't a single instant of either one in this movie. The plot line was not only predictable, it was boring. The script was awful. The cinematography was good but the editing drove me insane -- what was with all the completely random fade ins and outs to black? I kept expecting commercials to appear on the movie screen. I think that the editor and director must have been trying to cause suspense with them, but that's the most juvenile way of causing suspense I've ever seen. I feel very disappointed in both the director -- who apparently was the same director of the excellent Fight Club -- and Jodie Foster. With as grand a career as hers, she should know better than to sign herself up for a dud like this one. I was expecting to at least be entertained by this movie, and I wasn't. It was a waste of my money and my Friday night.
Suspense and fantasy mixed into one!
posted on 29 Jun 2009I really had no expectations for this film but did watch with growinginterest as the plot developed. Halfway through the movie I wastotally hooked and then one clever scene really boosted myimpression of the film. But then...things went quickly downhill. Thedirector or screenwriter tosses any sort of reality or plausibility outthe window, probably to "keep things interesting" and that's when Istarted to develop a hatred for what was going on in this movie. It'sreally hard to comment on without revealing too much, but therewere at least a dozen times in the last quarter of the movie when Iwas exclaiming "Oh yeah, right!" The lesson I learned from thismovie is that when you make a tight physical-based movie with acompact well-textured set don't expect the audience to suspendtheir disbelief. I gave it a 6.
A very bad movie.
posted on 30 Aug 2009This movie really doesn't make any sense. I started watching it on TV when it was like busy for 15 minutes, but anyway, the story is that a woman and her daughter moved into a new house, and burglars come to rob it and then they hide in a panic room. Well, the first thing i saw: Who the hell sleeps with the lights on and someone who has diabetes, already passes out if she doesn't get a shot in an hour??. If you read some other comments you see a lot more stuff that just isn't right. This movie is so unrealistic and really no excitement at all. I laughed at parts i actually had to be shocked. Really, do yourself a favor and don't hire/buy/watch this movie.