The Devil Wears Prada Movie
Storyline
TAGLINES
Hell On Heels.
Miranda Priestley, of "Runway" magazine tears up the landscape as a demanding fashion editor. She is a terror to everyone who is around her as is quickly depicted in the opening scenes of the movie. Her first assistant strives to please her and tries to emulate her, but one can sense that she is not quite as hard as she tries to put on. Into this mix comes a young woman who knows nothing of the fashion industry, has never read the magazine, and doesn't know who Miranda Priestley is. She only sees this as a stepping stone to another journalism position. Showing no fashion sense and immediately scorned by everyone, Miranda nonetheless hires her as the second assistant. When Miranda demands that she obtain the next unpublished Harry Potter manuscript, you can sense that she is trying to force her to quit, but it makes the young woman dig in to please her boss. With the help of one of the magazine's fashion editors, she gets a complete makeover and a new security. However, with her new appearance and the demands placed on her, she starts to lose her friends, family and her live-in boy friend. As she is whisked away to Paris with Miranda and faces all of the glamor that could be hers, including a flashy if not artificial freelance journalist, she is forced to make the decision of where she wants to be in her life.
| Meryl Streep | Miranda Priestly |
| Anne Hathaway | Andy Sachs |
| Emily Blunt | Emily |
| Stanley Tucci | Nigel |
| Simon Baker | Christian Thompson |
| Adrian Grenier | Nate |
| Tracie Thoms | Lily |
| Rich Sommer | Doug |
| Daniel Sunjata | James Holt |
| David Marshall Grant | Richard Sachs |
| James Naughton | Stephen |
| Tibor Feldman | Irv Ravitz |
| Rebecca Mader | Jocelyn |
| Jimena Hoyos | Lucia |
| Gisele Bündchen | Serena |
| David Frankel |
6.80 out of 10 (23458 votes)
Visitor Reviews
Save your money, go read the book
posted on 20 Aug 2009As a big fan of the book, I was very disappointed by the movie version. I went in excited because I thought I was going to see all of my favorite scenes translated to film but was disappointed because this wasn't the case. The whole "Lily" subplot is not there and that makes for one boring ending. While Lily does mention that she and Andy have been best friends for sixteen years, not much else is said. In the book, Lily is a college student studying Russian literature and she sleeps with random guys and has a drinking problem. In the movie, all we know about her is that she is Andy's best friend and she owns an art gallery. In the movie, Andy just leaves her job in Paris instead of the much more dramatic ending in the book where she goes to Lily who has been in an accident. Also, the character of Alex was totally cut out of the movie and instead her boyfriend is Nate. The only thing I liked about the movie was Meryl Streep's performance. I say, save your money and read the book. The book is richer and is more interesting. Hollywood has once again taken a perfectly good book and twisted it into a disaster of a movie.
A Hollywood lecture...
posted on 20 Aug 2009A Hollywood lecture on Moral and Ethics... Give me a break! - Working hard is "out", your boss is the devil, having a successful career is wrong, or at least immoral... Things that are "in" include being sloppy, average, unsuccessful, going back to your boring, loser boyfriend, quitting a dream job because it is demanding ("...because hell, a job mustn't be demanding at all to be considered worth keeping nowadays..."), etc.These are just some of the messages this movie passes on to the audience... How much more 'political correctness' can a decent human being take all at once... What a load of contemporary liberal Hollywood Bu****it! Berardinelli hits the mark when in his review he asks: 'Whatever happened to hard-edged endings in satires?' Yes, exactly, what happened to them? Well, the answer is: We invented political correctness...Having said that, on a positive note, the performances of Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci are by far the best thing in this movie, the only thing that makes this film worth watching. Again I will borrow from Berardinelli's review where he says: 'When Streep, Blunt, and Tucci are together, the scene crackles with energy. When none of them are present, The Devil Wears Prada slips into a black hole'. In other, I agree with the nomination the movie received for the costume design, which was really good. Otherwise, this was a mediocre film.
A Vehicle for Streep That Breaks Down Every Few Minutes
posted on 20 Aug 2009As many people will tell you, Meryl Streep is one of the best actresses ever to be recorded on film. And I'm not going to disagree with that opinion. In fact, I wholeheartedly support it. In the case of "The Devil Wears Prada", it seems as though the original novel, written by Lauren Weisberger, was written for Ms. Streep. The character of Miranda Priestly is so perfect for Ms. Streep, it's scary. And, yes, this is to say that Ms. Streep pulls off the performance of her perfect-fit character with seemingly great ease, and a lot of brilliance. Anne Hathaway, who gets second billing, is Priestly's new hire, a bright-eyed young woman who knows nothing about fashion, but applies for an internship at Miranda Priestly's magazine (go figure.) The film sputters and starts, and it seems as though all the juciest writing has been saved for Ms. Streep, and everyone else gets the flip-side of the coin. The scenes that Ms. Streep is not in (about half) are tearjerkingly bad; you just can't wait for Miranda to return and steal the show again. Stanley Tucci turns in a superb performance as gay fashonista Nigel, who befriends and helps Andy, Ms. Hathaway's character. Entourage's Adrian Grenier is sleepy and dull as the token boyfriend, and he and Ms. Hathaway have an almost-negative amount of chemistry on-screen. The film's plot is almost nonexistent, and is almost immaturish in it's lack of structure and pacing, from its director, David Frankel (whom I hold in high regard for his helming of Part 9 of "Band of Brothers"). To sum it up, Ms. Hathaway is upstaged by Tucci and Streep, even when they are not on screen. And that's about the highest praise I can give to any performance.
Absolute fun to watch.
posted on 18 Aug 2009Meryl Streep was stunning. If I was only allowed a one-line review, that would be it. She was brilliant, and it was such a thrill watching her bask unapologetically in her demanding, diva-like behavior. Her frigid "that's all" would have sent braver men running for cover, and her glare could have crumbled cement. She tossed her list of things to do the same way she did her coat and handbag on her assistants' desk: carelessly, and certain that someone would handle them exactly the way she wanted them to.That said, she played the part of adoring mother and broken woman equally well, so much so that I couldn't understand how the other occupants of the fashion world could find her so terrifying.One of my absolute favorite scenes of the movie came at the end, when Miranda and Andy see each other outside of the Runway building, after Andy has resigned. Andy smiles at Miranda, gives her a slight nod, and watches as Miranda slips into her car without another look. What Andy doesn't know is that Miranda is observing her from her window, with a smile -- a rare, rare gift. All of a sudden, the smile slips, and Miranda snaps "go" at her unsuspecting driver, giving him one of her best are-you-stupid? looks in the whole movie. I loved it. It was such a Miranda thing to do. Perfect, perfect, perfect.Anne Hathaway was not as disappointing as I expected her to be, either, and the performances by Stanley Tucci, Emily Blunt and Adrian Grenier (who, as Andy's neglected boyfriend, had me rooting for him throughout the movie) were spot-on, as well. My only complaint is Simon Baker, who, while walking the fine line between suave and sleazy, tipped too far right and landed in unsavory territory for the better half of the movie. He did this without any charm, mind, and any fool could have seen that he was not the type of guy Andy would have fallen for.The film also had a bit of a Sex And The City feel to it (although that could just have been brought on by the big fashion names) and it was only when I googled David Frankel that I found out that he had, indeed, directed a couple of episodes for the series. There is nothing particularly interesting about his style, but it's very well done and incredibly smooth, which I admire very, very much.Another thing I enjoyed was the breadth of the film. It covered family, friendship, loyalty, integrity, relationships, dieting, fashion, Harry Potter, success, ambition, stepping stones... the list goes on. Fun for the whole family.Unfortunately, that's all I have to say about this movie. Aside from rambling on about Meryl Streep's brilliance at playing Miranda Priestley, I don't have much else to say. Better still, I don't have many other complaints, except maybe how predictable certain parts of the plot were. That was salvaged, though, because I was surprised by many other things, like the announcement of Jacqueline as James Holt's partner instead of Nigel, as had been previously alluded to.Overall, even if there had been anything fundamentally wrong with the film, Meryl Streep would have saved it from being crucified. And since there wasn't, she only added to the stellar quality.
Mary Tyler Moore for the new millennium
posted on 16 Aug 2009I reluctantly went to see this film, but came away very glad I did. While in many ways very much the "chic flick, "The Devil Wears Prada" is more than just a pretty picture.The plot is pretty simple. Andy, a recent college graduate, manages to land a dream job as number two assistant to the editor of the top women's fashion magazine in the country. Andy, played smoothly and appealingly by Anne Hathaway, is smart, resourceful and has a kind of quiet self confidence that allows her to be good at her job, even for the most part brushing aside the highly negative comments from her coworkers, most of which center around the fact that she does not dress up to their standards. But with the help of a mentor, art director Stanley Tucci, she is able to tap into all the free clothes left around there after photo shoots and winds up looking like she stepped out of Vogue every time she steps out of the house. (Okay, that does stretch things a little, as obviously the clothes would be recognized by the other girls, who would probably whine about why they didn't get the same treatment.) The big conflict here? Andy's boss makes Mary Tyler Moore's Mister Grant look like Mother Teresa. Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, is truly the boss from hell. She is the kind of officer who gets fragged by his own men on the battlefield. But, to the film's credit, she is also portrayed as smart, exceptionally good at what she does, and a person quickly able to spot a phony a mile away.Streep gives an Academy Award winning performance here and no doubt will get a nomination. Her work is exceptional, when you consider that in her other big hit of the year, "A Prairie Home Companion," she plays a small time country western singer and pulls that role off with equal success.**************spoiler alert**************** While the film does in fact feature lots of nifty clothes for the women to ogle, it does go more than skin deep,for Andy slowly but surely finds herself sacrificing her life to this 24-7 job she has taken on, eventually losing her live in boyfriend and most of her friends, too.And in the film's most controversial twist, she decides in the end, after watching Miranda lose her third husband in a row, that the job just isn't worth it. So, Andy symbolically throws her cell phone into a fountain and walks out -- on the limousines, the trips to Paris, the potentially big salary and the chance to rub shoulders with the rich, the famous and the well dressed.Would this happen in real life? Maybe, but probably not. And when Meryl Streep whines that if she were a man, nobody would complain about the long hours she works, she may be mouthing feminist rhetoric, but not being truthful. The fact is, lots of wives complain about the very same thing, when their husbands are the ones who are never home or always missing the kids birthday parties. The fact is, people of both genders sacrifice their personal lives to achieve success in their careers.Perhaps the biggest lesson of the film is found in Stanley Tucci's character, who is promised a major job with a new concern, only to be screwed over in the end because of Miranda's need to maneuver a rival into that job to protect her own position at the magazine.That is probably the real lesson of this film. Even if you are very good at your job and even if you do work 24-7 and sacrifice everything for your career, there is no guarantee that some superior will not screw you over, because of his or her personal agenda or maybe do it just on a whim.Unfortunately, all the pretty clothes and glamour of this film may conceal that important part of the message.
The Most Enjoyable Movie This Year (So far...)
posted on 14 Aug 2009I went into this movie with lukewarm expectations and came out of it extremely entertained. The cast is probably better than the material, but they were so good that they elevated it to a film that I can't wait to own when it is released on DVD. Meryl Streep is fantastic. She never raises her voices above a loud whisper, yet she commands so much fear and respect that you're in awe. I also love the way they made her up--silvery hair is a great touch to add to her icy personality. Anne Hathaway was a good choice, making Andy smart, klutzy, independent, and cleans up nice with a make-over. Stanley Tucci, Adrien Grenier, Simon Baker and Emily Blunt were perfect in their roles. It is a really enjoyable film with some good lessons about the choices that we make and their consequences. I know all the hype right now is about SUPERMAN RETURNS, but I saw that the next day and it was so boring, long and badly cast that I considered running to the next theater so watch PRADA again. Lotsa, lotsa fun for anyone.
Cinderella Gets Couture Makeover
posted on 14 Aug 2009Set in the self-important world of the fashion industry, you have Meryl Streep as Miranda Priestly, the Wicked Stepmother editor of one of the top style publications, and Anne Hathaway enters her world as Andy Sachs, the under-appreciated, overworked support for her. Stanley Tucci is Nigel, the fairy godfather who helps transform Andy's style, making her ready for her debut on the scene, and Emily Blunt plays the jealous sister in arms in the same position as Andy but with ravenous ambitions. Simon Baker is Christian, the Prince of Andy's career who brings connections aplenty and is hoping to be the captain of her heart and Adrian Grenier as Nate, her long suffering beau dealing with her transformation. The story plays out exactly as a light version of the classic fairy tale in Haute Couture, with Miranda not nearly as wicked as she could have been (or should have been), Emily not nearly as competitive, and Andy much more single minded, providing a nice little twist at the end. That's all.
A very interesting film and one that defines fashion
posted on 10 Aug 2009This movie, the devil wears Prada, is an interesting film. The plot seems to be predictable for the first hour of the film and you feel as if you know the exact ending. However, the film then twists and bends into something you didn't predict, something you never would have imagined, but nevertheless something that is genius; sub plots. The devil wears Prada is a great film with very different moments. Comicial moments, happy moments, sad moments, even surprisingly touching moments that grab your heart. The acting is fantastic. Meryl Streep is, of course, fantastic. You can't even tell she is acting she plays her part so well. You feel as if you are REALLY looking at a mean and cruel boss instead of a person simply stating lines. Anne Hathaway is also wonderful, and she brings us moments of comedy, joy, satisfaction; tons of different feelings inside of you. Emily Blunt plays her character very professionally and with elegance and, of course, somewhat fear of her boss. She plays her part perfectly. Everyone plays their part perfectly. From the main character do a guy who walks into a party. As you watch the film, you realize that this film does define fashion and the fashion world. The mandatory requirements are being skinny and being beautiful. This film I would have to say meets those requirements. It is somewhat short and doesn't waste time on scenes that are pointless, so one could say it is skinny. And more importantly, it is beautiful.
As Glossy as a Magazine, and About as Substantive
posted on 08 Aug 2009A slick entertainment with a plot someone phoned in and a fairy tale ending in which every conceivable loose end is tied up as neatly and happily as your average network sitcom. I had a lot of fun with the movie, but my expectations were low and would have been sorely disappointed if they'd been any higher. The key to any movie like this is: "Know what you're getting." Meryl Streep of course gets all of the praise for this film, and indeed she is a riot. She resists the temptation to play the role of Miranda Priestley as a gross caricature, and instead decides to play her as a real person, which gives the movie dimensions it wouldn't have had otherwise. The character of Miranda would have been too unbearable to be fun if someone else had played her, but Streep knows how to deliver a nasty line while letting us know she's in on the joke, and her character is by far the best thing about the movie.Stanley Tucci, that unsung character actor, is also terrific as Nigel, Anne Hathaway's Henry Higgins. Is there anything this guy can't do?"The Devil Wears Prada" sends an obligatory message about staying true to yourself and your priorities in life, a message the film itself undermines by making the world within the fashion magazine office seem more interesting and glamorous than anything going on outside of it.Grade: B+
i like this movie!
posted on 04 Aug 2009hello,everybody!!!!~~'''' I am a secondary student from Hong Kong, I like the movie---The Devil wears Prada very much!!For the past month or so, I have been eagerly awaiting this movie. I love Meryl Streep, I like Anne Hathaway.So, now that I've seen it, I have to say it is one of the funniest movies I've seen this year. The screenwriter has maintained everything that was funny about the book. If you like beautiful clothes and beautiful people, you should watch this movie!!!!! I like beautiful things very much!!!'''' Meryl Streep is really really great! She is cool and beautiful.Meryl Streep is absolutely amazing as Miranda Priestly, and I especially liked the way that, as Miranda, she never raised her voice above normal speaking level. Anne Hathaway is great too!! I felt really surprised when she landed a job that '''a million girls would die for''''!!!! The supporting players were also very good, especially Emily Blunt (as Andrea's caustic fellow assistant, Emily) and Stanley Tucci (as Miranda's loyal but beleaguered right-hand man, Nigel). It is interesting!!! I love this movie...= = I like PRADA too!! Hope you all enjoy this great movie!!!!!! thank you~ that's all!! BYE BYE'''...
I loved It!!!!
posted on 29 Jul 2009This Movie is great! I love Ann Hathaway in it and Meryl Streep was fabulous! If you haven't seen it yet you've gotta. Ummm....I can't really say much without spoiling it but....this movie is really a great movie. One of the best I've seen all year. If you think it's just a "Chick Flick" it's not. Because there are guys in the fashion business also. Umm....It really describes the fashion world well. Before this movie I thought of fashion in a totally different way. Again, Like I said, If you haven't seen this movie you have to at least to see what I'm talking about...about the fashion world. Or just to find out if you like the movie or not.
Having it both ways
posted on 29 Jul 2009Oh, what a seductive little cheat this movie was. From the title, one obviously expects a little Faustian morality tale about the seductive lure of the superficial (but gorgeous!), and at one level, that's what you get. Unfortunately, like movies whose ostensible point is to condemn violence by tossing in titillating heaps of it, The Devil Wears Prada whorishly revels in the world it satirizes. It hits many girls where they live (beautiful clothes, cool make-overs, etc.)and at the same time asks them to please reject it all. Let's consider our heroine. We can't have her REALLY go over to the dark side,even a little, can we? She'll discover how good she can look with a new haircut and nifty Chanel thigh-highs (and, oh, she does look good). She'll get to go to Paris, too (hey, we'd looooove to see Fashion Week there)-- and not by just selfishly accepting the offer at the expense of her colleague. Heck no. Said colleague will get hit by a car. SHE's in no shape for Paris, so why shouldn't Andy go? She also gets to have some kissing-under-the-lamppost,postcardy ooh-la-la with Simon Baker and still not cheat on her doting boyfriend (they were conveniently "on a break," so no-harm, no-foul sort of deal). Clothes, Paris, extracurricular sex, and . . . how does it all end? Right back where it started. Our heroine gets the high ground and gets to enjoy the low ground, too. And our "devil" of the title? Bitch or Mistress of the Universe? She has it both ways as well. We're meant to deplore and laugh at her high-handed ridiculousness, yet admire her for just doing what it takes to be a success in a man's world. So ultimately how are we supposed to feel about Andy's excursion into the fashion world? Superior, I suppose. And a little used.
fashion passion
posted on 29 Jul 2009As Meryl Streep has long been known for serious roles - some of them a bit sappy - it was great to see her play the bitchy lead in "The Devil Wears Prada". Anne Hathaway plays a young woman who moves to New York and gets a job working at Streep's fashion magazine, only to find that Streep lives an entire existence based on schadenfreude (she's only happy if everyone else is on pins and needles), wants the most impossible things (e.g., the unpublished Harry Potter manuscript) and that the people in the fashion industry are too full of themselves for their own good (they act like they're curing cancer). Unless she can do something to rock the boat.I think that Streep had some of the funniest lines that I've heard in a long time, namely her whole monologue about cerulean. It goes to show how ridiculous these people in the upper echelons really are, but I also like some of the stuff (oops, "stuff" is a forbidden word in fashion!) that Hathaway pulls. Like "Pret-a-Porter" and "Zoolander", this movie leaves nothing unscathed. You gotta love it as much as I did. It certainly deserved its Oscar nominations. So yes, don't bore me with your...questions.Also starring Stanley Tucci, Emily Blunt and Simon Baker.
So so, redeemed somewhat by good actors
posted on 27 Jul 2009I'll be the first to admit that I'm not in the right demographic to enjoy a film like this. I'm a guy, I'm not interested in fashion, and I'm not fascinated by fancy parties. So right off the bat this film had to do a lot to interest me.And as it turned out, it didn't really do much to interest me. Yes, Meryl Streep is a great actress and she did a credible job here - enough to hold my interest. It's not like she had a lot to work with here - the character was largely a cardboard cutout - but she made me pay attention.One problem the film had was with its basic premise. Ho ho ho, the characters say, how could someone who looks like Anne Hathaway expect to work at a magazine like this? Uh, maybe because Anne Hathaway is an almost ridiculously good looking young woman, and is the kind of person whose face looks as if it was designed specifically to go on the cover of a magazine? Yes, she's not as skinny as a stick like some models, but she is thin, and when the characters talked about her like she was some ugly duckling it completely took me out of the moment. They should have either cast another actress (although that would have been a mistake because Anne's a good actress) or toned down the dialog.Stanly Tucci was good as always. Adrian Grenier was fine, although didn't have much to work with. Emily Blunt was adequate.But overall the movie just didn't connect with me. From the first scenes I could predict almost everything that would come, and I don't mean that in a good way. The decent performances save this from utter oblivion, but I certainly wouldn't rush out to get this one, unless you're a nut for fashion.
SO fun!!
posted on 25 Jul 2009I thought this movie was SO much fun and while it drifted from the book, it did so in a way as to not be annoying but to add to a really viciously fun story. Anne Hathaway did an knock-out job as did, the always perfect Meryl Streep. Stanley Tucci was perfect as the gay designer side-kick as was Emily Blunt, who I am now a big fan of. I am puzzled with what I consider the miscasting of Simon Baker -- not intriguing enough (or hell, at LEAST he should have kept his accent). Otherwise, vicious, silly and all around great. Oh and it really made me want to drink wine, eat grilled cheese and vamp the streets of NY in some couture!
One of the most fun movies I've seen in a long time!
posted on 25 Jul 2009I thought this movie had it all. I can understand how this movie may not be a top ten for everyone, but I can guarantee that no matter your age or gender you will be NOT disappointed. Why I gave it my highest movie rating thus far: 1) it was light hearted, the fun clothes and sarcastic comments had me and my girlfriend laughing out loud 2) it had it's serious moments -realizing your becoming distance from friends and family; realizing what you will and will not do to get ahead in life 3) as always I believe that people often rate movies the highest when the situations/characters are most relatable to themselves- therefore being a 20 something female trying to juggle work and relationship and friends and co-workers I identified with this movie completely. I understand how she felt first starting a job where no one gave her a hand, I understand how hard it is to submerge yourself into a new phase and yet keep your same characteristic. 4)Meryl Streep and Anne Hathway are wicked in this movie, their characters unbelievable realistic Yes the character Miranda is extreme but when you think about it how else do women in today's society get ahead? Most of the time they do have to be extra cold and workaholics to be taken as serious a man in the same position. 5) the thing I loved most about this movie is that it ended up surprising me in the end by not making this a "she's really a softy underneath it all" feel good movie. I thought for sure that in the end Miranda was going to realize what a bitch she had been all the years, then have an epithany and her and Andy were going to end up being best of friends drinking tea together. I absolutely loved the car scene when Miranda revealed that she had played ruthlessly to end up where she was ( and is that really a bad thing in this society? would it be more understandable if Miranda had been a man? business is business right?). After seeing the car scene I thought the title of the movie was highly highly appropriate and loved Meryl's Streep calm portrayal of such a realistically cold, evil and greedy person!Great movie, go and see it!!!
An excellent Mainstream, commercial movie to come out in a very long time.
posted on 23 Jul 2009Devil wears prada is definitely a once in a while great movie going experience. Well by that I mean entertainment. This movie is devilishly entertaining throughout and is a fun ride.I don't know why some Wierdos hated this movie for being entertaining. Some person is busy commenting about the movie being predictable and all. Well I don't know what kind of twist would heor she have brought to the tale if given the chance.Haven't read the book so I have nothing to compare this movie to. But I don't think I would regret not having read the book first. Well the movie is good enough that I don't think I shall be reading the book anymore, I will rather watch the movie again. Anyways especial thanks to the whole unit of "Devil Wears Prada"'s whole unit members for such an excellent movie. Thanks for the devilishly perfect cast.Meryl Streep is Brilliant as always, but in this movie there is something more to her as usualality.. Well I don't exactly know what that is but It pretty much depends on how well she performed the devil's role. I hardly remember myself ever being so empowered by some actresses Charisma like Meryl Streeps' She's simply Sensational, Phenomenal. I bet she will win the trophy for the best supporting actress this year at the Oscars.As for Anne Hathaway, she's the future superstar, I can bet on that. She does her role all the justice there is. She's excellent. No other young actress would do this role as good as Anne does. The other supporting cast is also superb.Emily Blunt is surprisingly very good.The screenplay is excellent. The dialogs are devilishly good. The Direction is just perfectly entertaining. The soundtracks are Marvelous. Performances Phenomenal. What more.I don't think anyone will dislike this movie. Ohh!!! Unless you have a problem. 10/10
The Devil Wears Prada
posted on 21 Jul 2009The Devil Wears Prada has been Hollywood-ized, so instead of sharp satire, we have musical montages with bad covers of 90's hits (Crazy by Seal is an example). However, the two female leads (Anne Hathaway and Meryl Streep) are so good that they transcend the clichés, or at least make them less nauseating. The movie, like the book, has no substance or deep issues, it is just enjoyable trash. The book was plane reading, but this movie deserves a little bit better than plane watching. Maybe a rental or an HBO viewing. I must say it is refreshing to see a movie with two female leads that isn't a complete waste of time for anyone who has testicles or a sexist horror film.2.5/4
Most Beautiful Movie About Fashion I Ever Seen!!!
posted on 21 Jul 2009Meryl Streep is one of my favorite female actors. She can act everything. She can be funny, smart, clever, ironic and etc. Miranda Priestly is shows the evil side of Merryl Streep. She acted so real, that I thought, that she is so bad in real life too.Anne Hathaway looks great in Andy Sachs character. She looks very mature in that role (if you watched "Princess Diaries").Other actors looks great too. Emily Blunt has spice, that makes her a great actress. Simon Baker is one of the worst, but he acts better and better...Movies was fantastic. It really makes my expectation looks like awful movie. I thinks, that it is the best book to movie adaptation in this century...
Movie Involves Anoerexia and an Annoying Boss
posted on 28 Aug 2009THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA is a movie involving a young woman and the devil (her boss) who in the end doesn't seem much like the demon I described one line ago.I saw this movie in Drexel Theaters with "friends" who back stabbed me a year later. I thought it was a very entertaining movie and I look forward to purchasing it on DVD. I don't remember much of it since it was released in 2006 but I do remember that my day ended with a good movie that didn't bore me for one second.I recommend this movie for anyone of all ages. If you liked the Princess Diaries book and/or movie, I have a feeling you will like this movie. So I recommend this movie for you too.